|
|
#4733 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: R32 GTR, AW11 MR2 SC, GTS86 R
Location: OZ
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 603
Thanked 1,224 Times in 708 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
From what you listed, one would be able to do chip design the other one won't so that's why I am not sure what he's on about.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4734 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: GBS Premium
Location: Denver
Posts: 154
Thanks: 41
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I wouldn't get pedantic out the term "Computer Science Engineer", generally speaking CS is software, CE is hardware (not exclusively chip design). Any tuner is going to be doing a little bit of both.
The last 2 pages are kind of worthless. Both tuners are worthwhile, I have tunes from both and neither tune light years ahead of the other.
__________________
Last edited by olorin; 06-11-2014 at 12:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4735 |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I come bearing gifts! The first graph is a stock brz/frs. The second shows a brz/frs with stock 75mm pulley, intercooled, on 91 octane. This is comparing the CARB tune vs our 8.58 tune for the same setup. Enjoy! Also note we're able to start our pulls below 2000 to show how the vehicle responds at extremely low rpm and high loads.
Maha Dyno Chart Graphs (How To Analyze) - Blue Lines - Wheel Horsepower (Real world horsepower) - Red Lines - Horsepower Normalized (Similar to Dyno Jet) - Orange Lines - Torque Normalized (Similar to Dyno Jet) - Green Lines - Drag (Drivetrain power loss) - Solid Lines - Current Tune we offer - Dotted Lines - Tune for comparion purposes ![]() ![]() Enjoy! Sincerely, Zach Delicious Tuning Last edited by DeliciousTuning; 06-12-2014 at 01:43 AM. Reason: Added How to Analyze Maha Charts |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post: | Lawnik (06-12-2014) |
|
|
#4736 |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Very basic math time. 201\136=1.478 1.478*165=243. So with a typical baseline of 165whp that the innovate stage 2 kit with 75mm running 91 octane would make ~243whp. I'm not sure where the graph is that shows the comparison of the carb tune and your 8.58?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4737 | |
|
Mr. Cranky Pants
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 Argento FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 449
Thanks: 76
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Maybe the dotted lines in that second graph... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4738 |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
As stated directly in the post under the "How to read Maha Graphs", the dotted line references the CARB tune, and the solid line is 8.58. We also included the Maha's uncorrected reading, as well as it's corrected reading, which is the comparable to Dynojet number. If you're having any trouble understanding the graph, please re read the key in the post
![]() Sincerely, Zach Delicious Tuning |
|
|
|
|
|
#4739 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: Sask., Canada
Posts: 250
Thanks: 84
Thanked 89 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Has the CARB tune changed at all since the initial release? That torque curve looks much different(worse) than what your dyno chart shows above. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to R2 For This Useful Post: | poptopclk (06-14-2014) |
|
|
#4740 | |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
We would like to point out our dyno pull started at 1500 RPM, and I am pretty sure you will not find another dyno chart anywhere with the Innovate tune starting at 1500 RPM's. Being this low of an RPM, will have a large impact on the torque as you can see in the dyno chart. We do know that the automatic guys drive their vehicles in this range a LOT and we wanted to test this area to show it is possible to make more torque over stock even at 1500 RPM with this kit. While we also wanted to show it is smooth even if you were in 6th gear and needed to floor it, so you would feel a pull like a stock vehicle. Now also note different dyno's will measure differently and that is why it is important to show a before after results on the same dyno along with a stock baseline comparison. The way the loads are ramped up on each particular dyno will have a massive affect on the torque values shown and how they are measured. Because of this it makes it hard to duplicate the torque on a Maha dyno to say a Dynojet for instance, which are two totally different styles of dynos. The CARB tune that Innovate Motorsports offers has not changed since it was released and can not be changed because it is the CARB approved tune. So it will be like that forever, unless retested with the new tune. Now as far as what is shown, the dotted line (- - -) is the CARB tune which is labeled 8.1 for our own records. The solid line (____) is our new 8.58 tune we currently offer. As you can see in the dyno charts there is a fair amount of improvement across the board, especially on the top end. And to go along with the tune is the MPG increase over the CARB tune. We have spent a fair amount of time dialing in the fueling so we can obtain a much better fuel economy over the CARB tune. So far from the feedback we have received if you are cruising with the cruise control active at 65 mph most of our customer are getting near or at stock MPG. Now when you get on it, that is a different story. LOL Hope this answers some questions. Cheers, William Knose Delicious Tuning |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#4741 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: White FR-S
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 25
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
My kit is finally installed with a Delicious tune and 72.5mm pulley. Loving the difference so far. I believe I still have a little air in the intercooler plumbing and am looking for tips/tricks from anyone on how to completely purge the system of air. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4742 | |
|
That Guy
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I was looking at it on my phone. I didn't see/notice the dotted line.
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post: | DeliciousTuning (06-12-2014) |
|
|
#4743 |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Here is a little more info to soak in. We have a back to back test of the 75mm pulley versus a 70mm pulley and the exact same Stage 2 8.58 tune we offer. No additional tuning required.
![]() Green - Baseline Stock Vehicle, after about 3 pulls to get the ECU to learn to add power. Blue - 75mm pulley with the 8.58 tune Red - 70mm pulley with the same 8.58 tune As you can see there is a power improvement across the entire power band, and we can see as much gains as much as 15 hp and 13 ft/lbs of torque. Definitely a worthwhile upgrade with no other upgrades needed. Porbably the cheapest upgrade you can do to make 15 horsepower. Cheers, William Knose Delicious Tuning |
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#4744 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: Frs
Location: Westside
Posts: 158
Thanks: 38
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Last edited by Powersfrs; 06-12-2014 at 09:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4745 | |
|
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4746 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Raven FR-S
Location: Victoria TX
Posts: 335
Thanks: 372
Thanked 95 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
__________________
Raven FR-S mods: Unichip, Ground Control street coilovers with camber plates and strut tower brace, SPC Lca's, Drag DR-38 wheels with Dunlop Direzza DZ101s, Perrin CAI and silicone inlet tube, Perrin 3" resonated catback, Perrin high flow catted front pipe, Rev Works UEL header.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Innovative ideas to increase interior storage capacity? | swift996 | Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) | 0 | 01-30-2013 11:45 PM |
| AVO vs Innovative | diss7 | Forced Induction | 32 | 01-21-2013 07:15 PM |
| Not another need to drive topic | Sargy | Mid-Atlantic | 5 | 11-27-2012 01:18 PM |
| Technical topic sub-forums | OrbitalEllipses | Site Announcements / Questions / Issues | 1 | 07-18-2012 12:38 AM |
| Can you close the topic please? | Standardsuspension | Brakes, Suspension, Chassis | 14 | 06-26-2012 06:14 PM |