follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-11-2014, 09:03 AM   #4733
s2d4
Senior Member
 
s2d4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: R32 GTR, AW11 MR2 SC, GTS86 R
Location: OZ
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 603
Thanked 1,224 Times in 708 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clayrush View Post
I think computer science and computer engineer are considered separate fields or disciplines. But are related?
From what you listed, one would be able to do chip design the other one won't so that's why I am not sure what he's on about.
__________________
s2d4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2014, 11:04 AM   #4734
olorin
Senior Member
 
olorin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: GBS Premium
Location: Denver
Posts: 154
Thanks: 41
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I wouldn't get pedantic out the term "Computer Science Engineer", generally speaking CS is software, CE is hardware (not exclusively chip design). Any tuner is going to be doing a little bit of both.

The last 2 pages are kind of worthless. Both tuners are worthwhile, I have tunes from both and neither tune light years ahead of the other.
__________________

Last edited by olorin; 06-11-2014 at 12:45 PM.
olorin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 01:40 AM   #4735
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I come bearing gifts! The first graph is a stock brz/frs. The second shows a brz/frs with stock 75mm pulley, intercooled, on 91 octane. This is comparing the CARB tune vs our 8.58 tune for the same setup. Enjoy! Also note we're able to start our pulls below 2000 to show how the vehicle responds at extremely low rpm and high loads.

Maha Dyno Chart Graphs (How To Analyze)
- Blue Lines - Wheel Horsepower (Real world horsepower)
- Red Lines - Horsepower Normalized (Similar to Dyno Jet)
- Orange Lines - Torque Normalized (Similar to Dyno Jet)
- Green Lines - Drag (Drivetrain power loss)
- Solid Lines - Current Tune we offer
- Dotted Lines - Tune for comparion purposes






Enjoy!

Sincerely,

Zach
Delicious Tuning

Last edited by DeliciousTuning; 06-12-2014 at 01:43 AM. Reason: Added How to Analyze Maha Charts
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post:
Lawnik (06-12-2014)
Old 06-12-2014, 06:13 AM   #4736
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Very basic math time. 201\136=1.478 1.478*165=243. So with a typical baseline of 165whp that the innovate stage 2 kit with 75mm running 91 octane would make ~243whp. I'm not sure where the graph is that shows the comparison of the carb tune and your 8.58?
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 09:51 AM   #4737
Sellout
Mr. Cranky Pants
 
Sellout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 Argento FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 449
Thanks: 76
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
Very basic math time. 201\136=1.478 1.478*165=243. So with a typical baseline of 165whp that the innovate stage 2 kit with 75mm running 91 octane would make ~243whp.
Yep. There's a dynojet sheet in this thread showing that: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...ovate+shipping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum View Post
I'm not sure where the graph is that shows the comparison of the carb tune and your 8.58?
Maybe the dotted lines in that second graph...
Sellout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 01:08 PM   #4738
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
As stated directly in the post under the "How to read Maha Graphs", the dotted line references the CARB tune, and the solid line is 8.58. We also included the Maha's uncorrected reading, as well as it's corrected reading, which is the comparable to Dynojet number. If you're having any trouble understanding the graph, please re read the key in the post


Sincerely,


Zach
Delicious Tuning
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 01:23 PM   #4739
R2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: Sask., Canada
Posts: 250
Thanks: 84
Thanked 89 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sales@delicioustuning.com View Post
As stated directly in the post under the "How to read Maha Graphs", the dotted line references the CARB tune, and the solid line is 8.58. We also included the Maha's uncorrected reading, as well as it's corrected reading, which is the comparable to Dynojet number. If you're having any trouble understanding the graph, please re read the key in the post


Sincerely,

Zach
Delicious Tuning


Has the CARB tune changed at all since the initial release? That torque curve looks much different(worse) than what your dyno chart shows above.
R2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to R2 For This Useful Post:
poptopclk (06-14-2014)
Old 06-12-2014, 02:26 PM   #4740
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by R2 View Post
Has the CARB tune changed at all since the initial release? That torque curve looks much different(worse) than what your dyno chart shows above.
Well it depends on how you look at the curve and also is dependent on the dyno being used. While the dyno being used is importnet we also have a couple other points to bring up with respect to the tune and dyno charts.

We would like to point out our dyno pull started at 1500 RPM, and I am pretty sure you will not find another dyno chart anywhere with the Innovate tune starting at 1500 RPM's. Being this low of an RPM, will have a large impact on the torque as you can see in the dyno chart. We do know that the automatic guys drive their vehicles in this range a LOT and we wanted to test this area to show it is possible to make more torque over stock even at 1500 RPM with this kit. While we also wanted to show it is smooth even if you were in 6th gear and needed to floor it, so you would feel a pull like a stock vehicle.

Now also note different dyno's will measure differently and that is why it is important to show a before after results on the same dyno along with a stock baseline comparison. The way the loads are ramped up on each particular dyno will have a massive affect on the torque values shown and how they are measured. Because of this it makes it hard to duplicate the torque on a Maha dyno to say a Dynojet for instance, which are two totally different styles of dynos.

The CARB tune that Innovate Motorsports offers has not changed since it was released and can not be changed because it is the CARB approved tune. So it will be like that forever, unless retested with the new tune.

Now as far as what is shown, the dotted line (- - -) is the CARB tune which is labeled 8.1 for our own records. The solid line (____) is our new 8.58 tune we currently offer. As you can see in the dyno charts there is a fair amount of improvement across the board, especially on the top end. And to go along with the tune is the MPG increase over the CARB tune. We have spent a fair amount of time dialing in the fueling so we can obtain a much better fuel economy over the CARB tune. So far from the feedback we have received if you are cruising with the cruise control active at 65 mph most of our customer are getting near or at stock MPG. Now when you get on it, that is a different story. LOL

Hope this answers some questions.

Cheers,
William Knose
Delicious Tuning
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post:
CK_Bladesmith (06-12-2014), Lawnik (06-12-2014), R2 (06-12-2014)
Old 06-12-2014, 04:16 PM   #4741
bakilman
Member
 
bakilman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: White FR-S
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 25
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
My kit is finally installed with a Delicious tune and 72.5mm pulley. Loving the difference so far. I believe I still have a little air in the intercooler plumbing and am looking for tips/tricks from anyone on how to completely purge the system of air. Thank you!
bakilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 04:45 PM   #4742
Calum
That Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2013 asphalt FRS MT
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 4,865
Thanks: 5,058
Thanked 2,868 Times in 1,499 Posts
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sellout View Post
Yep. There's a dynojet sheet in this thread showing that: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showt...ovate+shipping



Maybe the dotted lines in that second graph...
I was looking at it on my phone. I didn't see/notice the dotted line.
Calum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Calum For This Useful Post:
DeliciousTuning (06-12-2014)
Old 06-12-2014, 08:49 PM   #4743
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Here is a little more info to soak in. We have a back to back test of the 75mm pulley versus a 70mm pulley and the exact same Stage 2 8.58 tune we offer. No additional tuning required.



Green - Baseline Stock Vehicle, after about 3 pulls to get the ECU to learn to add power.
Blue - 75mm pulley with the 8.58 tune
Red - 70mm pulley with the same 8.58 tune

As you can see there is a power improvement across the entire power band, and we can see as much gains as much as 15 hp and 13 ft/lbs of torque. Definitely a worthwhile upgrade with no other upgrades needed. Porbably the cheapest upgrade you can do to make 15 horsepower.

Cheers,
William Knose
Delicious Tuning
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DeliciousTuning For This Useful Post:
CK_Bladesmith (06-12-2014), Lawnik (06-12-2014), mikalem (06-12-2014), Powersfrs (06-12-2014)
Old 06-12-2014, 08:59 PM   #4744
Powersfrs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: Frs
Location: Westside
Posts: 158
Thanks: 38
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeliciousTuning View Post

We would like to point out our dyno pull started at 1500 RPM, and I am pretty sure you will not find another dyno chart anywhere with the Innovate tune starting at 1500 RPM's. Being this low of an RPM, will have a large impact on the torque as you can see in the dyno chart. We do know that the automatic guys drive their vehicles in this range a LOT and we wanted to test this area to show it is possible to make more torque over stock even at 1500 RPM with this kit. While we also wanted to show it is smooth even if you were in 6th gear and needed to floor it, so you would feel a pull like a stock vehicle.



Cheers,
William Knose
Delicious Tuning
Very true! It does make a lot more torque even down on the 1500 -2000 rpm range. There's no need for me to change down a gear to pass some one in 6th gear in the freeway and I'm auto e85 non intercool 75 pulley can't imagine with the intercooler n 70 pulley

Last edited by Powersfrs; 06-12-2014 at 09:30 PM.
Powersfrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 09:26 PM   #4745
DeliciousTuning
PhoneFlash by EcuTeK
 
DeliciousTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 309
Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts
Mentioned: 403 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Powersfrs View Post
Very true! It does make a lot more torque even down on the 1500 -2000 rpm range. There's no need for me to change down a gear to pass some one in 6th gear in the freeway and I'm auto non intercool 75 pulley can't imagine with the intercooler n 70 pulley
Then add E85 to that.
DeliciousTuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2014, 09:27 PM   #4746
CK_Bladesmith
Senior Member
 
CK_Bladesmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Raven FR-S
Location: Victoria TX
Posts: 335
Thanks: 372
Thanked 95 Times in 75 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeliciousTuning View Post
Then add E85 to that.

And a new clutch lmao.
__________________
Raven FR-S mods: Unichip, Ground Control street coilovers with camber plates and strut tower brace, SPC Lca's, Drag DR-38 wheels with Dunlop Direzza DZ101s, Perrin CAI and silicone inlet tube, Perrin 3" resonated catback, Perrin high flow catted front pipe, Rev Works UEL header.
CK_Bladesmith is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
2 whp better than n/a e85, 2 whp? you're an idiot., 2screwsbetterthan0screw, 65 whp better than na e85, bspt fittings ftl, hate u all me no have sc, im just here for the tags, inorite!, it's no turbo but, only big numbers matter, screwyou, whine sexier than turbo, whines_more_than_your_gf, wts grey market butthurt.


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Innovative ideas to increase interior storage capacity? swift996 Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 0 01-30-2013 11:45 PM
AVO vs Innovative diss7 Forced Induction 32 01-21-2013 07:15 PM
Not another need to drive topic Sargy Mid-Atlantic 5 11-27-2012 01:18 PM
Technical topic sub-forums OrbitalEllipses Site Announcements / Questions / Issues 1 07-18-2012 12:38 AM
Can you close the topic please? Standardsuspension Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 14 06-26-2012 06:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.