How to disable or turn off Smart Stop Tech ?!

[Pouria]

hey guys
thanks for your time and discuss and share the information with us
i still have that problem
no one knows how to disable that ? any? even with OFT or ECUTEK?
i'm gonna thinking about sell this and buy a new.like subaru BRZ..or Engine Swap
i hate toyota with that Tech.this is a sport car.why the car needs the SST ?????

[churchx]

This is cheap RWD coupe with good handling, it's NOT sport car. Many of twins might be used in motorsports due that, but that still is minority. 9/10 may never see the track.
While i also among those that enjoy trackdays, SST also never had limited me in any way. Heck, without this thread i wouldn't even now about it. Somehow fail to see what's a big fuss about, and how having or not that feature, and made easier or not very specific and uncommon type of abuse that rarely if at all would be used in actual sport use may kill car's value.

[Tor]

Originally Posted by Pouria

hey guys
thanks for your time and discuss and share the information with us
i still have that problem
no one knows how to disable that ? any? even with OFT or ECUTEK?
i'm gonna thinking about sell this and buy a new.like subaru BRZ..or Engine Swap
i hate toyota with that Tech.this is a sport car.why the car needs the SST ?????

Before selling your GT86 and buying a BRZ, you might want to ask the Subaru dealer if you can try to do a couple of burnouts first to test it out first.

There is a great likelihood that if the GT86 has it, the BRZ will have it too .

Originally Posted by churchx

While i also among those that enjoy trackdays, SST also never had limited me in any way. Heck, without this thread i wouldn't even now about it.

Neither did I, one can learn a lot form these forums!

[Pouria]

Originally Posted by churchx

This is cheap RWD coupe with good handling, it's NOT sport car. Many of twins might be used in motorsports due that, but that still is minority. 9/10 may never see the track.
While i also among those that enjoy trackdays, SST also never had limited me in any way. Heck, without this thread i wouldn't even now about it. Somehow fail to see what's a big fuss about, and how having or not that feature, and made easier or not very specific and uncommon type of abuse that rarely if at all would be used in actual sport use may kill car's value.

absolutely you're right.i agree with you
but because i love burning tires and smoke , i love this car,before i bought it, that was my wish to have it.
i like the handling and sound the engine and the Manual trans oh god,it is really good .. more
my friends have GT86 and BRZ
they havent that problem.i think i'm unlucky
Thank you so much guys

[churchx]

Pouria: and in opposite there are things in MY2017 gt86 i'd gladly exchange mine for :P
Improved VSC, cheaper AC refills, strenghtened engine internals, improved & more comfortable stock suspension, improved intake airbox & exhaust headers, better stock tune, imho nicer ratio FD. That all to me sounds much better then SST, that impacts some very brief & very specific (ab)use, while those enhanced things one can enjoy all the other use/driving/owning time.

[Juzzotec]

This isn’t a burnout car, you should enjoy it for what it is... a cheap sports car.
Maybe the 86/BRZ isn’t for you, burnouts are pointless man and are only cool in a muscle car in my opinion. A 2ltr na burnout is kind of wack.

[Tokay444]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

Copy address
Paste


2.33 is a burn out! No brakes used.

I'd call that a rolling burnout.

Can we fling poo at OP now? This has gone on for far too many pages already.

[Decep]

Originally Posted by churchx

This is cheap RWD coupe with good handling, it's NOT sport car. Many of twins might be used in motorsports due that, but that still is minority. 9/10 may never see the track.
While i also among those that enjoy trackdays, SST also never had limited me in any way. Heck, without this thread i wouldn't even now about it. Somehow fail to see what's a big fuss about, and how having or not that feature, and made easier or not very specific and uncommon type of abuse that rarely if at all would be used in actual sport use may kill car's value.

it is definitely a sports car...never heard anyone besides you say that? light, rwd, light on creature comforts. not a convertible but thats ok in my book.

[churchx]

Decep: you know .. here i've seen used in motorsports, track & rally, cars that don't fit your description way more often, then ones that do.
Golfs, pumas, fiestas, audi-s, sierras, astras, civics, escorts, corollas, old russian lada-s, some bmw-s, imprezas, evos, volvos. Often 3/5rd of them FWD, RWD being usually <1/6th, rest AWD, most often being initially normal family compact or full size cars, ones that are dual-used, often with full stock standard comfort features.
In sport even east germany trabant can be used. That won't make it sport car as manufacturer intended designing it. I may accept that something like CS-R3 twin IS sport car, but not original twins that oversell those actually real sport cars by three orders larger numbers.
You can use one in motorsports, you can modify one in specialised sport car, it may do better then many others .. but by far it's NOT sportcar. Cheap RWD coupe with relatively good handling, as toyobaru designed it and as most are buying it. I'm not sure that even 1/10 had ever been taken to track. Most are just simply daily driven & used/chosen in role as i described.

[Summerwolf]

I truly think this is operator error in the end of things. To say doing a burnout in this car is "whack" is pretty idiotic. It's a rwd sporty car. Anything doing a burnout is decent!

[Tokay444]

Originally Posted by churchx

Decep: you know .. here i've seen used in motorsports, track & rally, cars that don't fit your description way more often, then ones that do.
Golfs, pumas, fiestas, audi-s, sierras, astras, civics, escorts, corollas, old russian lada-s, some bmw-s, imprezas, evos, volvos. Often 3/5rd of them FWD, RWD being usually <1/6th, rest AWD, most often being initially normal family compact or full size cars, ones that are dual-used, often with full stock standard comfort features.
In sport even east germany trabant can be used. That won't make it sport car as manufacturer intended designing it. I may accept that something like CS-R3 twin IS sport car, but not original twins that oversell those actually real sport cars by three orders larger numbers.
You can use one in motorsports, you can modify one in specialised sport car, it may do better then many others .. but by far it's NOT sportcar. Cheap RWD coupe with relatively good handling, as toyobaru designed it and as most are buying it. I'm not sure that even 1/10 had ever been taken to track. Most are just simply daily driven & used/chosen in role as i described.

By the definition of sports car, it's a sports car.

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by Pouria

hey guys
thanks for your time and discuss and share the information with us
i still have that problem
no one knows how to disable that ? any? even with OFT or ECUTEK?
i'm gonna thinking about sell this and buy a new.like subaru BRZ..or Engine Swap
i hate toyota with that Tech.this is a sport car.why the car needs the SST ?????

BRZ is the same bloody car with all the same equipment.
Even if you manage to bypass the SST you will still have to deal with the LSD trying to even out the traction unless you can manage to have both rear wheels spinning exactly the same speed.
Go buy a Mustang.

[Tokay444]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

BRZ is the same bloody car with all the same equipment.
Even if you manage to bypass the SST you will still have to deal with the LSD trying to even out the traction unless you can manage to have both rear wheels spinning exactly the same speed.
Go buy a Mustang.

When the diff locks, they'll be the same speed.

[Cole]

Originally Posted by Tokay444

By the definition of sports car, it's a sports car.

sports car
ˈspôrts ˌkär/Submit
noun
a low-built car designed for performance at high speeds.

Try again.