Nameless Performance Equal Length Stepped Header

[FrsDuke]

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses

Just seeing that graph again rustles my jimmies. Dat torque, yo.

Plural?

[OrbitalEllipses]

Originally Posted by FrsDuke

Plural?

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/that-r...led-my-jimmies

[BRZ?]

Originally Posted by mad_sb

I would expect numbers to be as good or better than the updated results from post #3, first graph.. They stated that was rev 4 (i think) and they went through several more interations before they found one that performs as well at that one but that was able to fit without modification to anything else.

You have to remember that these numbers are achieved with their header AND a full 3" exhaust so no, i bet you will be very disappointed if you are expecting these numbers from a stock car with the nameless header

[StormTrooper]

3inch on a na car shows very small gains. ...even nameless who sells 3inch exhaust for na points out that it's just for max hp builds.

I would be extremely surprised to see more than 3-5hp top end and 1-2 midrange. It would be twice as loud. And weigh 10 lbs more. Not worth it.

[Mad_Mike]

Originally Posted by StormTrooper

Yes you could.....

I would have bought it at 1350 but i needed my tax returns. .....so in about 5 days.


Now i might as well wait to see if it really is better.

1150 for 2 other EL headers and 1k for the best uel coated.....

You could wait and see if they do another black Friday sale. We might have dynos by then.

[mad_sb]

Originally Posted by BRZ?

You have to remember that these numbers are achieved with their header AND a full 3" exhaust so no, i bet you will be very disappointed if you are expecting these numbers from a stock car with the nameless header

They posted the 2.5" graph as well and it was only a few whp difference. It's buried in the thread somewhere. The torque down low as a bigger difference with 3" vs 2.5" but that was also with this earlier revision.

On another note, I personally i hope they shifted the design more in favor of top end power... I could care less about a mountain of torque at 3,500 rpm if it falls away at 4,500..

[OrbitalEllipses]

Originally Posted by mad_sb

They posted the 2.5" graph as well and it was only a few whp difference. It's buried in the thread somewhere. The torque down low as a bigger difference with 3" vs 2.5" but that was also with this earlier revision.

On another note, I personally i hope they shifted the design more in favor of top end power... I could care less about a mountain of torque at 3,500 rpm if it falls away at 4,500..

+45WTQ everywhere!


ALL OF THE TORQUES!

[Ryan@Nameless]

Originally Posted by Efferalgan

@Ryan@Nameless

I dare to re-post my questions with regards to the header design. Since it went into production already I guess at least the later 2 should be easy to answer. Thanks in advance!

My apologies, I must have missed this post, we've been awful busy around here and I don't always have time to check the forums.

We have only confirmed fitment with the Innovate SC, so I cannot say one way or the other if it will fit with Brand X SC at this time. The runners come up in front of the crank pulley near the lower baffle on the factory intake, so that may create a fitment issue for some kits. Until we test fit there is no way to say for sure, however.

Primaries are 1.75", secondaries are 2", and the collector is 3"

Shipped weight is 25lbs, we should be right around 21-23lbs for the finished product.

Originally Posted by Jive Turkey

i'm not complaining, i understand fully. its basic capitalism and supply/demand. they can charge w/e they want.

however its obvious they can sell for 1100 and make profit, or else why introduce it at that price, another example is the over/front pipe. cost of a 3" is almost double that off at the 2.5, is there that much more material used for a 3" to make it cost almost double?

is it quality, yes. do i think the price represents what its genuinely worth? no.

not like any of this will in the end stop me from buying their products, i plan to buy the header/rest of the exhaust come spring anyways, i just don't like to know that as a consumer i'm being taken advantage of because they have the only product on the market.

carry on. lets see some dyno's

It is not simply tubing cost that is the difference there. The bends are more expensive, it takes more time to fabricate, it includes a 3" resonator standard, and has a few more welds than our 2.5" system.

Tubing size is not the only factor that contributes to increased cost on a given part, there are many variables that can cause different hurdles.

Originally Posted by Dustin

Any more updated pics of progress?

Ask and you shall receive









-Ryan @ Nameless

[raven1231]

Originally Posted by Mad_Mike

You could wait and see if they do another black Friday sale. We might have dynos by then.

Come on man....You're being ridiculous. Give them time. Quality companies who produce headers crafted by Sauron takes time . I say they will have them on the dyno sometime before the next millennium

[FrsDuke]

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/that-r...led-my-jimmies

The popularity only makes it worse. That being said, this is the Internet and I'm glad to hear you aren't afflicted with multiple jimmies.

[OrbitalEllipses]

Originally Posted by FrsDuke

The popularity only makes it worse. That being said, this is the Internet and I'm glad to hear you aren't afflicted with multiple jimmies.

Think it'd be interesting to have more than one.

[zooki]

Damn, for 1500 bones that thing better rock my world and make me a sammich afterwards...

[Trefoil]

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses

Think it'd be interesting to have more than one.

There was a guy on Reddit with that problem. The link stayed blue on my computer, but people talked about it quite a bit.

[OrbitalEllipses]

Originally Posted by zooki

Damn, for 1500 bones that thing better rock my world and make me a sammich afterwards...

Costs less than a GF who won't do either reliably.