|
||||||
| Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires. |
| View Poll Results: 17x9 -VS- 18x9 | |||
| 17x9 |
|
43 | 66.15% |
| 18x9 |
|
22 | 33.85% |
| Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#15 |
|
Emperor JDM
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Yea, I'm looking more along the lines of a Yokohama S.drive , Falken 452 or something in that range. People must got deep pockets to DD on Dunlop star specs or other extreme summer performance variants that wear fast.
At my current stock power level, it's too much tire to run 255's that are sticky summers. A mid performance summer 255 would be great for a 17x9 or 18x9 I believe. For what I use my car for, it should be optimal. I do plan to wrap the stock wheels with Hankook RS3's. It makes the most sense to me to just use the stock wheels with sticky summer tires when only at the stock power levels or basic bolt-ons. It's so hard to decide... 17"s or 18"!!!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Have you actually priced out wheel and tire costs for what you're looking for? That should really guide your decision more than people on a forum telling you what to do.
As for your stock wheels, IMO you should sell them and buy a set of light 17x8's for the RS3's. Dropping ~5lbs per wheel is nothing to laugh at, and a set of used RPF1's shouldn't be more than ~$600-700.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: whiteout gt86 2015 IS350fsport
Location: northern kentucky. cincy
Posts: 1,931
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 697 Times in 437 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
your exactly right 18s will look better but the 17s may perform better
__________________
INSTAGRAM @Rcf_700 www.youtube.com/boostindub
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Emperor JDM
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I absolutely love the fat bulge look with a 255/40r17 on a 17x9 rim. That's what I run on the back of my mr2. Aesthetics and raw functional is my taste. I will admit that I'm heavily leaning towards going 17x9's with the FRS. Functional fat tires will look incredible on all four corners.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS, 2008 R32
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,201
Thanks: 715
Thanked 593 Times in 383 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
![]() 18x9.5 with 265/35 tires because #bootymeat |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mfbmike For This Useful Post: | hmong337 (12-20-2013) |
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Go spend some time in the HDPE/Track section and see what people have to say about tire/wheel sizes and lap times. CSG runs 17x8 with 225's on their shop car because that was faster (with actual quantitative testing) than 17x9's with 245's. If you think saving more than 5lbs per wheel isn't significant on a track you might want to rethink spending any money on R comps too. Have you considered what supporting suspension mods you need to take advantage of the grip from R comps? They'll need much higher spring rates than most people will run. I'm not saying you shouldn't go wider if you like the look, but wider will not always give you more grip or make you faster. FWIW, if you wanted a bulged look you can put a 245 on an 8" rim safely, it just won't be quite as quick as if it were on a 9" rim (we're talking a couple tenths per lap, not huge). A 245 on a 9" rim is going to be pretty square, almost bordering on a slight stretch.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wheel Directory: ESM 004 17x9.0 +38 | Scott | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 25 | 06-26-2017 05:54 AM |
| WTB: 18x9.5/ 18x9/ 17x9/ 17x9.5 Square With or without tires | loogs | Wheels and Tires | 11 | 12-08-2013 04:40 PM |
| Should I try a 17x9 +20 square? | Drftfan | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 15 | 07-21-2013 06:40 PM |
| 18x9.5 +45 (square) VS 18x9.5 +35 Front 18x8.5 +40 Rear (staggered) | Funky Fresh | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 42 | 05-07-2013 10:52 AM |
| 17X9 SQUARE OR 18X8.5F AND 18X9.5R | DAN_BRZ | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 42 | 05-03-2013 02:33 PM |