follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2010, 09:07 PM   #15
S2KtoFT86
Resident Post Whore
 
S2KtoFT86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2022 WR BRZ
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexicon101 View Post
Regardless of his oversight, this really isn't relevant to the FT-86 in the way you posted it. This is about existing Toyota vehicles, and the reputation of Toyota Motor Co., not about the FT-86 specifically.

Edit: o_o Where'd they go?
It might not be relevant but I'm sure that people will still remember this down the road, regardless if they fix it or not. It's just human nature. I really hope they overcome this though.
__________________
Gavin

S2KtoFT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 10:03 PM   #16
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Wow, come on guys.

Justice is only justified if the judging party is completely unbiased. Thats why we have a court system, to take disputes between two biased parties (defendant and plaintiff) to a completely neutral party with no allegiance, save the public (judge).

1) The Government practically controls GM and Chrysler
2) The nation is facing its hugest debt deficit ever, in history, period
3) The current Executive administration and Congress Majority aren't exactly known for NOT spending even more money ontop of this.
4) The automotive industry is a huge money-bank, and the more GM and Chrysler make, the more money the Government will get.
5) All of the current high spending activities are based off the assumption that the economy will recover to much higher levels in a short period of time, ergo offsetting the spending via tax intakes.
6) One HUGE way to get the economy back rolling? Investing in American automobiles.

I'm no conspiracy theorist but sometimes shit's just way to coincidental to sick back and go "huh, well, gee, isn't that just wierd!"

Fuck all of this bullshit. I'm buying Toyota (or Ford, if I buy American) until the end of my days (inb4 yu'll dae from not bbeing able to brake! lololol). GM and Chrysler will never see a dime of money, not until the Government has absolutely 0% stake in both. Even after that, I never cared for either anyways.

You say you get mad that car companies try to cover up problems without rectifying them? You think GM is any better? Ford? Chrysler? I'm not quite that naive.

The Big 3 made POS's from the late 70's all the way to 2000. Not EVERY model, but a majority.
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 10:52 PM   #17
Lexicon101
Inexperienced
 
Lexicon101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: Crappy old '90 civic. Frankie.
Location: In the club
Posts: 622
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSkoolToys View Post
Wow, come on guys.

Justice is only justified if the judging party is completely unbiased. Thats why we have a court system, to take disputes between two biased parties (defendant and plaintiff) to a completely neutral party with no allegiance, save the public (judge).

1) The Government practically controls GM and Chrysler
2) The nation is facing its hugest debt deficit ever, in history, period
3) The current Executive administration and Congress Majority aren't exactly known for NOT spending even more money ontop of this.
4) The automotive industry is a huge money-bank, and the more GM and Chrysler make, the more money the Government will get.
5) All of the current high spending activities are based off the assumption that the economy will recover to much higher levels in a short period of time, ergo offsetting the spending via tax intakes.
6) One HUGE way to get the economy back rolling? Investing in American automobiles.

I'm no conspiracy theorist but sometimes shit's just way to coincidental to sick back and go "huh, well, gee, isn't that just wierd!"

Fuck all of this bullshit. I'm buying Toyota (or Ford, if I buy American) until the end of my days (inb4 yu'll dae from not bbeing able to brake! lololol). GM and Chrysler will never see a dime of money, not until the Government has absolutely 0% stake in both. Even after that, I never cared for either anyways.

You say you get mad that car companies try to cover up problems without rectifying them? You think GM is any better? Ford? Chrysler? I'm not quite that naive.

The Big 3 made POS's from the late 70's all the way to 2000. Not EVERY model, but a majority.
Lexicon101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 12:33 AM   #18
chulooz
Registered you sir
 
chulooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
yes.... it is upsetting that Toyota tries to cover up this problem without rectifying it. I dont care if GM made rolling shit at least those are not putting people in danger, no other car company has faced accusations comparable to this. Although I would agree with the idea that there is a good chance of some conspiracy within this.

Oh and I just have to say that Justice(while it may not be perfect) in the legal system is the final verdict of the courts.
chulooz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:37 AM   #19
Lexicon101
Inexperienced
 
Lexicon101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: Crappy old '90 civic. Frankie.
Location: In the club
Posts: 622
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chulooz View Post
yes.... it is upsetting that Toyota tries to cover up this problem without rectifying it. I dont care if GM made rolling shit at least those are not putting people in danger, no other car company has faced accusations comparable to this. Although I would agree with the idea that there is a good chance of some conspiracy within this.

Oh and I just have to say that Justice(while it may not be perfect) in the legal system is the final verdict of the courts.
GM made the Fiero, which has a reputation for FIRE in the engine bay.
Don't act like nobody else has built anything dangerous.

Justice can't be served by a biased party, and the government OWNS companies that compete directly with Toyota. You must admit that you can't trust the government to be completely neutral on this.
If you don't doubt your government and question it, you've failed at being an American.
(Of course.. that's just the way I see it.. but... the founding fathers obviously also saw it that way, so.. I gotz homiez to back me up.)
Lexicon101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 11:58 AM   #20
mike2100
Senior Member
 
mike2100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 560
Thanks: 188
Thanked 187 Times in 120 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 5 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by chulooz View Post
no other car company has faced accusations comparable to this.
I'd rather drive a car that accelerates unexpectedly (controllable) vs a car that has a chance to blow up when struck from behind (pinto, uncontrollable) or catch on fire (fiero, explorer?) or roll over from exploding tires (explorer).

In fact, wasn't the last major safety debacle in the late 90s with the exploder tires? Or was that the early naughties?
mike2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:21 PM   #21
Siriusly.Andrew
Senior Member
 
Siriusly.Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 1995 Civic DX
Location: Fort St. John BC CAN
Posts: 557
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
And whats Safe about riding a mechanical contraption down the road at 75MPH?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
Anyway, as i was saying, "speed is expensive, how fast are you willing to spend?"
Siriusly.Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:28 PM   #22
S2KtoFT86
Resident Post Whore
 
S2KtoFT86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2022 WR BRZ
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSkoolToys View Post
Wow, come on guys.

Justice is only justified if the judging party is completely unbiased. Thats why we have a court system, to take disputes between two biased parties (defendant and plaintiff) to a completely neutral party with no allegiance, save the public (judge).

1) The Government practically controls GM and Chrysler
2) The nation is facing its hugest debt deficit ever, in history, period
3) The current Executive administration and Congress Majority aren't exactly known for NOT spending even more money ontop of this.
4) The automotive industry is a huge money-bank, and the more GM and Chrysler make, the more money the Government will get.
5) All of the current high spending activities are based off the assumption that the economy will recover to much higher levels in a short period of time, ergo offsetting the spending via tax intakes.
6) One HUGE way to get the economy back rolling? Investing in American automobiles.

I'm no conspiracy theorist but sometimes shit's just way to coincidental to sick back and go "huh, well, gee, isn't that just wierd!"

Fuck all of this bullshit. I'm buying Toyota (or Ford, if I buy American) until the end of my days (inb4 yu'll dae from not bbeing able to brake! lololol). GM and Chrysler will never see a dime of money, not until the Government has absolutely 0% stake in both. Even after that, I never cared for either anyways.

You say you get mad that car companies try to cover up problems without rectifying them? You think GM is any better? Ford? Chrysler? I'm not quite that naive.

The Big 3 made POS's from the late 70's all the way to 2000. Not EVERY model, but a majority.
I never said I was upset with Toyota. I said I hope they can overcome this by all means and I'm sure they eventually will. It's just that the majority of Americans will see this at face value and say "well I don't trust them anymore" and thus won't buy their product.

Maybe that wasn't directed at me and I'm just paranoid, dunno.
__________________
Gavin

S2KtoFT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 01:58 PM   #23
Siriusly.Andrew
Senior Member
 
Siriusly.Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 1995 Civic DX
Location: Fort St. John BC CAN
Posts: 557
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think your paranoid, Maybe you should take off your flame-suit? :P
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
Anyway, as i was saying, "speed is expensive, how fast are you willing to spend?"
Siriusly.Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 04:22 PM   #24
Midship Runabout
formerly Dixie Normous
 
Midship Runabout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: The ladies wild!
Location: ())_)CRAYOLA)_))>
Posts: 996
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike2100 View Post
or catch on fire (fiero, Exploder?) or roll over from exploding tires (exploder).
fixed

Quote:
Originally Posted by S2KtoFT86 View Post
Maybe that wasn't directed at me and I'm just paranoid, dunno.
its alright buddy the honda hate is over and you dont got to think everyone is against you anymore.
Midship Runabout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 04:24 PM   #25
Lexicon101
Inexperienced
 
Lexicon101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: Crappy old '90 civic. Frankie.
Location: In the club
Posts: 622
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike2100 View Post
I'd rather drive a car that accelerates unexpectedly (controllable) vs a car that has a chance to blow up when struck from behind (pinto, uncontrollable) or catch on fire (fiero, explorer?) or roll over from exploding tires (explorer).

In fact, wasn't the last major safety debacle in the late 90s with the exploder tires? Or was that the early naughties?
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the rolling exploders!
Good catch.
Lexicon101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2010, 04:24 PM   #26
Lexicon101
Inexperienced
 
Lexicon101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: Crappy old '90 civic. Frankie.
Location: In the club
Posts: 622
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dixie Normous View Post
fixed
Agreed.
Lexicon101 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.