follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2012, 12:44 PM   #15
Hanzo
Senior Member
 
Hanzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Waiting for the ND Miata
Location: VA
Posts: 963
Thanks: 182
Thanked 656 Times in 194 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
Instead of saying "bigger" brakes a better word I should have said is "better" brakes. Better brakes w/ ABS is still better. The '03-'04 G35 sport package Brembo brakes were smaller than the non-branded G35 brakes that replaced them for '05-'07 but better because their pistons chomped down harder (a reason why '03-'04 are sought after by G35 shoppers which they nicknamed the "Brembo editions").
But surprisingly the none-Brembo later models have better stopping distance than the old Brembos. I'm sure repeated hard braking on the track will favor the Brembos but that's not my point. If brakes are powerful enough to stop the car well repeatedly why complicate things by adding more pistons and weight? Remember the NSX? It only had twin piston calipers but was enough for a stock NSX power and weight. The right tuning is better than over tuning.
Hanzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 12:54 PM   #16
delongedoug
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2.5 RS daily, Evo 8 track
Location: A little town called none of your goddamn business
Posts: 212
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
^Yeah def. want bigger brakes. Makes a huge difference even for everyday safety.
This is one of the most absurd posts I've ever seen.
delongedoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 02:40 PM   #17
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
^Rather than trolling why don't you say something intelligible and edumacate me. I've never done extensive research nor bought aftermarket brakes before. My only experience is that the G35 was the heaviest car I ever owned but had the best consistent stopping power I ever felt. So flame my enthusiasm.
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 02:43 PM   #18
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanzo View Post
But surprisingly the none-Brembo later models have better stopping distance than the old Brembos. I'm sure repeated hard braking on the track will favor the Brembos but that's not my point. If brakes are powerful enough to stop the car well repeatedly why complicate things by adding more pistons and weight? Remember the NSX? It only had twin piston calipers but was enough for a stock NSX power and weight. The right tuning is better than over tuning.
I don't want just any big brakes... but brakes tuned and selected for the STI moniker.
__________________
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 02:54 PM   #19
86'd
Senior Member
 
86'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2012 WRX Sedan
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 511
Thanks: 25
Thanked 97 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Irrational or not, I think the car would have to have something closer to 300hp (250+) for people to pay over 30K for a STI variant.

You drop the weight, add things like CF, and put out 260hp+ and that's Cayman territory and it will be priced accordingly, i.e. closer to 40K.

And then it becomes a car that Toyobaru didn't intend it to be.
86'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 03:21 PM   #20
Hanzo
Senior Member
 
Hanzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Waiting for the ND Miata
Location: VA
Posts: 963
Thanks: 182
Thanked 656 Times in 194 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
I'm pretty sure IF there is a turbo STI version coming out anytime soon it wouldn't be lighter than the current. Turbo, turbo piping, intercoolers, larger brakes, wider wheels and tires, etc all adds weight to the car. I would say it would end up being around 3100 lbs.
Hanzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 03:27 PM   #21
2fast4you
Senior Member
 
2fast4you's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2006 Scion tC RS 2.0
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 444
Thanks: 24
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
I've never done extensive research nor bought aftermarket brakes before. My only experience is that the G35 was the heaviest car I ever owned but had the best consistent stopping power I ever felt.
Big brakes don't always equal better stopping distance. Most people think they stop shorter because most BBKs use more aggressive pads with higher initial bite than OEM pads. Just upgrading pads and fluid will give the feel most people want out of a BBK for the street... for frequent track days, a BBK may be needed like in my avatar.
__________________
Brake. Turn. Accelerate. Repeat as necessary.
2fast4you is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 03:32 PM   #22
DMDZK
Member
 
DMDZK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2007 Cayman
Location: MN
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by switchlanez View Post
^Rather than trolling why don't you say something intelligible and edumacate me. I've never done extensive research nor bought aftermarket brakes before. My only experience is that the G35 was the heaviest car I ever owned but had the best consistent stopping power I ever felt. So flame my enthusiasm.
Most people assume bigger brakes, and more pistons equate to improved stopping distance. Realistically this isn't true, at least at face value.

The stock brakes will be more than capable of bringing this car to 100 - 0 very quickly. In fact they will be powerful enough to full lock and cause ABS to kick in. Because of this, I would not expect a BBK to help decrease stopping distance at all.

What upgraded brakes will do is this;

Bigger brakes and better pads will allow for improved cooling/heat dissipation. That means that brake fade will be less of an issue (only helpful if you track your car aggressively).

More pistons don't increase stopping power, instead they giver better feel and more even pad wear. This is helpful, but will not be that noticeable in a non track car.

For most car enthusiasts the best stopping mods you can do would be better tires, better brake pads, better brake fluid, and possibly some practice/training. a true BBK, costs 5k+ and is purely cosmetic unless you are on the track.
DMDZK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 03:46 PM   #23
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanzo View Post
I'm pretty sure IF there is a turbo STI version coming out anytime soon it wouldn't be lighter than the current. Turbo, turbo piping, intercoolers, larger brakes, wider wheels and tires, etc all adds weight to the car. I would say it would end up being around 3100 lbs.
350lbs for all of that? You must be crazy. I would venture to say 100-150lbs instead for a weight total of 2870-2920 lbs.

FA20 turbo=50-70 lbs heavier
STI sport pkg=30-40 lbs heavier(Hyundai's Rspec is 40 lbs heavier than base)

Remember the wheels would be lightweight and the brakes probably weigh 10 lbs more. Suspension probably wouldn't add much weight
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 04:17 PM   #24
Hanzo
Senior Member
 
Hanzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Waiting for the ND Miata
Location: VA
Posts: 963
Thanks: 182
Thanked 656 Times in 194 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 View Post
350lbs for all of that? You must be crazy. I would venture to say 100-150lbs instead for a weight total of 2870-2920 lbs.

FA20 turbo=50-70 lbs heavier
STI sport pkg=30-40 lbs heavier(Hyundai's Rspec is 40 lbs heavier than base)

Remember the wheels would be lightweight and the brakes probably weigh 10 lbs more. Suspension probably wouldn't add much weight
Of course it's all speculation but don't under estimate the weight when you start adding them up from here and there. Don't know if you ever held a turbo in your hands before but it's pretty damn heavy.
Hanzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 04:21 PM   #25
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanzo View Post
Of course it's all speculation but don't under estimate the weight when you start adding them up from here and there. Don't know if you ever held a turbo in your hands before but it's pretty damn heavy.
Not to mention the very heavy cast iron manifold, which would be even heavier on this car compared to an inline 4 manifold which are plenty heavy enough.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 04:36 PM   #26
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanzo View Post
Of course it's all speculation but don't under estimate the weight when you start adding them up from here and there. Don't know if you ever held a turbo in your hands before but it's pretty damn heavy.
Why don't we ask a Subaru guru about the weight of a Subaru stock turbo then.
SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 05:12 PM   #27
switchlanez
Glorious BRZ Master Race
 
switchlanez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Subaru Libird
Location: Race Wars
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 2,719 Times in 1,079 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMDZK View Post
Most people assume bigger brakes, and more pistons equate to improved stopping distance. Realistically this isn't true, at least at face value.

The stock brakes will be more than capable of bringing this car to 100 - 0 very quickly. In fact they will be powerful enough to full lock and cause ABS to kick in. Because of this, I would not expect a BBK to help decrease stopping distance at all.

What upgraded brakes will do is this;

Bigger brakes and better pads will allow for improved cooling/heat dissipation. That means that brake fade will be less of an issue (only helpful if you track your car aggressively).

More pistons don't increase stopping power, instead they giver better feel and more even pad wear. This is helpful, but will not be that noticeable in a non track car.

For most car enthusiasts the best stopping mods you can do would be better tires, better brake pads, better brake fluid, and possibly some practice/training. a true BBK, costs 5k+ and is purely cosmetic unless you are on the track.


My take away from this is bigger brakes are not always better. But even pad wear is always good, regardless of track or street. More durable parts>less durable parts. With all other things equal (tires, pads, fluid, skill) I still say better brakes (not necessarily bigger) can make stopping and maintenance better but would not be justified unless there is an increase in weight/power...

This assumes there will be an increase in power. Hints have been dropped on that happening. In a Top Gear Magazine review Subaru engineer Masuda-san asserted the BRZ will never see factory forced induction because they would have to add chassis reinforcements (read: weight) thus abandoning the "handling delight" essence of the car. But he did say, "We can fit tougher valve springs, and that would allow the BRZ to rev much higher, maybe to 9,000rpm."

If STI has a bump in power, I would expect upgraded brakes.
__________________

Last edited by switchlanez; 01-25-2012 at 05:22 PM.
switchlanez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 05:31 PM   #28
Hanzo
Senior Member
 
Hanzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Waiting for the ND Miata
Location: VA
Posts: 963
Thanks: 182
Thanked 656 Times in 194 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
I like the idea of 9K RPM.
Hanzo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.