follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-27-2012, 02:40 AM   #15
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by msile View Post
Yeah too bad you have to get under the car to see it.

Who makes it in aluminum?
No one that I'm aware of, but I haven't really been following the aftermarket for this car since I got a different car.

Hopefully someone makes it in aluminum sometime, as that would be a lot more affordable.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
brzzy (05-30-2016)
Old 09-27-2012, 02:42 AM   #16
Turdinator
Señor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 769 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
After the differential gear ratio reduction is taken into account, the effective moment of inertia decrease is pretty small compared to wheels. Of course, wheels can only be made so light, but their effective "moment radius" is still larger.
I thought it worked the other way since the drive shaft is spinning 4.1 times faster that the wheels therefore reduction in the rotational inertia is 4.1 times more effective?
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 03:11 AM   #17
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turdinator View Post
I thought it worked the other way since the drive shaft is spinning 4.1 times faster that the wheels therefore reduction in the rotational inertia is 4.1 times more effective?
What's the diameter of the driveshaft? What's the diameter of the wheel? See what I'm getting at?

I guess I should've written "the effective moment of inertia decrease is still pretty small compared to that of a reduction of mass at the wheels"
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 03:24 AM   #18
Turdinator
Señor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 769 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
What's the diameter of the driveshaft? What's the diameter of the wheel? See what I'm getting at?

I guess I should've written "the effective moment of inertia decrease is still pretty small compared to that of a reduction of mass at the wheels"
Ahhh, sorry i did misunderstand you. And i absolutely agree with what you are saying. The shaft would have to be ~ 4.5" diameter to make the same difference as lighter wheels. Which is why a light weight flywheel is such a good upgrade, but that has been covered in other threads.
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 10:07 AM   #19
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turdinator View Post
Ahhh, sorry i did misunderstand you. And i absolutely agree with what you are saying. The shaft would have to be ~ 4.5" diameter to make the same difference as lighter wheels. Which is why a light weight flywheel is such a good upgrade, but that has been covered in other threads.
Well of course not all of the wheel's mass is on the outer diameter (whereas much of the driveshaft is) but yea I'd bet that the effective "average radius" is still bigger on the wheels.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 12:28 PM   #20
SubieNate
Senior Member
 
SubieNate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 959
Thanks: 288
Thanked 560 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
That must be pretty awesome. I personally wouldn't spend that money (aluminum makes more sense in this situation imo) but CF is always badass
I have to disagree on the aluminum. Carbon has very very good natural vibrational damping properties and is extremely resistant to fatigue. Additionally, carbon shafts do a great job of smoothing out the powertrain and making it a bit more forgiving. I'd be interested in carbon for this fact alone aside from the weight savings and aluminum will never be able to get anywhere close in that regard.

Nathan
SubieNate is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SubieNate For This Useful Post:
funwheeldrive (05-29-2015), SirBrass (04-10-2014)
Old 09-27-2012, 12:38 PM   #21
Spartan65
USMC Veteran Semper Fi
 
Spartan65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2010 WR Blue STi
Location: NM it's part of the US
Posts: 955
Thanks: 801
Thanked 378 Times in 243 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
I wish they made this for the AT guys and gals.
__________________
Spartan65 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Spartan65 For This Useful Post:
Freeman (11-17-2012), mechaghost (09-27-2012), soros151 (11-20-2012)
Old 09-27-2012, 03:47 PM   #22
ShadowSeraph
Tech Master / Car Geek
 
ShadowSeraph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 AT Hot Lava FR-S
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 98
Thanks: 69
Thanked 38 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Yes, this is needed for an AT fit.
__________________
Perrin: Crank pulley, 3" Cat back, Nameless: 3" FP/OP
GFB: water and alternator pulleys
Borla: UEL Header
Hyper Black ROTA T2R 18x9.5, DSS CF Shaft for AT

-= OFT - Stage 2 UEL E85 - fine tuned by me. =-
ShadowSeraph is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ShadowSeraph For This Useful Post:
Spartan65 (09-27-2012)
Old 09-27-2012, 04:08 PM   #23
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubieNate View Post
I have to disagree on the aluminum. Carbon has very very good natural vibrational damping properties and is extremely resistant to fatigue. Additionally, carbon shafts do a great job of smoothing out the powertrain and making it a bit more forgiving. I'd be interested in carbon for this fact alone aside from the weight savings and aluminum will never be able to get anywhere close in that regard.

Nathan
I don't think fatigue is a big issue for a driveshaft since the reverse loads are small and there's not much cycling going on, but I may be wrong. Also while carbon probably damps vibrations better than aluminum, aluminum is still an improvement over steel in that regard, I believe.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 06:07 PM   #24
SubieNate
Senior Member
 
SubieNate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 959
Thanks: 288
Thanked 560 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
At least in the cycling world, aluminum frames are the absolute worst when it comes to vibration. Because they require thicker wall tubing and larger diameter tubing to reach the same strength (Aluminum is lower strength than steel obviously, but it is also much less dense so there's still potential weight savings over *most* steels.) they rattle you to death on rough roads.

Steel has a nice "hum" about it and a certain springyness. Carbon is like riding on a cloud, it damps everything out and also has a bit of spring.

Nathan
SubieNate is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SubieNate For This Useful Post:
kiichiro (03-01-2014), MmmHamSandwich (09-28-2014)
Old 09-27-2012, 06:32 PM   #25
F3dzo
Senior Member
 
F3dzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 13 fr-s whiteout
Location: South florida
Posts: 505
Thanks: 400
Thanked 211 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Garage
Hell yeah...
__________________
I'll be back!!
F3dzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 06:41 PM   #26
zoomzoomers
Senior Member
 
zoomzoomers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Subaru SWP BRZ Limited 6AT
Location: Darkside
Posts: 1,862
Thanks: 526
Thanked 305 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
No one that I'm aware of, but I haven't really been following the aftermarket for this car since I got a different car.

Hopefully someone makes it in aluminum sometime, as that would be a lot more affordable.
What you end up getting serial?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan65 View Post
I wish they made this for the AT guys and gals.
Is the shaft different for AT & MT?
__________________
Man Law#17:A man in the company of a hot, seductively dressed, woman MUST remain sober enough to fight!

MODS: AVO tubes + filter, Cusco (F) strut brace w/ MC brace, Perrin CBE, Subaru OEM trunk tray, Grimmspeed front license re-locator & hood struts and Beatsonic rear cam.
zoomzoomers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 06:42 PM   #27
zoomzoomers
Senior Member
 
zoomzoomers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 Subaru SWP BRZ Limited 6AT
Location: Darkside
Posts: 1,862
Thanks: 526
Thanked 305 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Cool mod BTW. Maybe I'll work up to doing this, but I don't know if I can justify the cost for it TBH. :happy0180:
__________________
Man Law#17:A man in the company of a hot, seductively dressed, woman MUST remain sober enough to fight!

MODS: AVO tubes + filter, Cusco (F) strut brace w/ MC brace, Perrin CBE, Subaru OEM trunk tray, Grimmspeed front license re-locator & hood struts and Beatsonic rear cam.
zoomzoomers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 06:49 PM   #28
Spartan65
USMC Veteran Semper Fi
 
Spartan65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2010 WR Blue STi
Location: NM it's part of the US
Posts: 955
Thanks: 801
Thanked 378 Times in 243 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomzoomers View Post
What you end up getting serial?



Is the shaft different for AT & MT?

According to RSD yes it is, probably in length and spline configuration.
__________________
Spartan65 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Spartan65 For This Useful Post:
zoomzoomers (09-27-2012)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PST Carbonfiber Drive Shaft In Stock and Ready To Go!! RallySport Direct Transmission and Driveline 27 11-18-2012 02:39 PM
Carbon Fiber Hoods. Asterisked Accolade Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 17 09-25-2012 05:44 PM
HELP...Drive Shaft/Rear Tire Shutter UM FRS Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 11 09-05-2012 12:14 PM
Does FRS come with Carbon drive shaft? STi88 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 30 07-30-2012 02:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.