follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2011, 10:28 PM   #15
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Serialk11r:

Old 4AGZE in the supercharged MR2 used an electromagnetic clutch to de-couple the blower at idle or low load or something...
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 12:48 AM   #16
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
Serialk11r:

Old 4AGZE in the supercharged MR2 used an electromagnetic clutch to de-couple the blower at idle or low load or something...
That it does. However, they used a roots type blower.
__________________
Welcome to FT86club.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
The 'FT' stands for 'forgot topic'.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 12:50 AM   #17
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
That it does. However, they used a roots type blower.
Could work with a Lysholm style, too.
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 01:18 AM   #18
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Wouldn't that require a bypass valve? In that case they can just open the bypass, the extra air goes back out, no energy spent.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 02:39 AM   #19
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
Could work with a Lysholm style, too.
No doubt. Don't dispute that at all. In fact, I wonder why Rotrex hasn't tried to implement that. Have they?

Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
Wouldn't that require a bypass valve? In that case they can just open the bypass, the extra air goes back out, no energy spent.
.... Bypass valve for what? Maybe I'm missing something?

The way the clutch works is that there is a coil and a plate. plate attached to the screw of the charger, coil in the pulley. When manifold vaccum drops below a programmed threshold amount, coil is energized, plate mated to pulley and surpercharger is engaged. Otherwise it doesn't blow. That's basically all there is to it.
__________________
Welcome to FT86club.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
The 'FT' stands for 'forgot topic'.
Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 02:53 AM   #20
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,046
Thanks: 7,726
Thanked 19,274 Times in 8,385 Posts
Mentioned: 696 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
'09 post I made
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Some ppl are doin' SC on their Impreza. IIRC Raptor made NA Impreza SC kit for it too. Raptor SC kit

As for Root blower, are you talkin' bout this?
.
plus here's the concept H4 SC
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 02:56 AM   #21
madfast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimman View Post
Positive displacement SC's are great for an upgraded DD situation, but they are usually limited to how much boost you can make efficiently.

I know a guy with a positive displacement kit on his Miata but no IC (integrated blower/manifold), and when he changed the pulley to get 10 (or 12, I don't remember) psi he needed water/meth to keep it from pinging.

He's making about 200 whp now though, and it sounds awesome. But if he wanted more power, he would be going turbo.
yes but the miata is a car that needs the responsiveness of a SC. consequently, turbo kits arent as popular as SC kits, on the NC miatas at least. also being that its such a small, light car. it need not have 400 hp. a 200 whp miata isnt the fastest thing on 4 wheels, but its no joke and i bet a ton of fun. sometimes less is more, when its done the right way...

the FT i've always thought of as a 2+2 coupe version of the miata. and likewise, it would do better with a SC and its responsiveness, its low end tq, its flat tq curve. and also likewise, it need not have huge power to be fast. and looking forward, the NC miata SC made 253 hp. the FT has D4-S that the miata doesnt have. also that kit only uses a 4th gen eaton unit. a TVS 6th gen eaton would again be better. so a 300 hp FT with a flat tq curve? that's not unrealistic... sign me up!!!

Last edited by madfast; 08-31-2011 at 03:28 AM.
madfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 03:00 AM   #22
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,074 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by MatadorRacing_F1 View Post
No doubt. Don't dispute that at all. In fact, I wonder why Rotrex hasn't tried to implement that. Have they?



.... Bypass valve for what? Maybe I'm missing something?

The way the clutch works is that there is a coil and a plate. plate attached to the screw of the charger, coil in the pulley. When manifold vaccum drops below a programmed threshold amount, coil is energized, plate mated to pulley and surpercharger is engaged. Otherwise it doesn't blow. That's basically all there is to it.
So with the pump disengaged, the engine has to pull air through the pump...I have a feeling that doesn't really work with a positive displacement pump. Thus, a bypass valve so the engine doesn't pull air through the pump.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 03:03 AM   #23
Dimman
Kuruma Otaku
 
Dimman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Mk3 Supra with Semi-built 7MGTE
Location: Greater Vancouver (New West)
Posts: 6,854
Thanks: 2,398
Thanked 2,265 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
So with the pump disengaged, the engine has to pull air through the pump...I have a feeling that doesn't really work with a positive displacement pump. Thus, a bypass valve so the engine doesn't pull air through the pump.
Correct. It has one.

http://mr2.com/TEXT/SuperChargerInfo.html
__________________


Because titanium.
Dimman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 03:09 AM   #24
Type[R]+
Senior Member
 
Type[R]+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: Lexus IS-F
Location: Australia
Posts: 529
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The only problem with tvs/roots I can see is intercooling. Seems like a PITA to do it, where as with centrifugal, just whack in a air-water intercooler inline and away you go.
Type[R]+ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 03:11 AM   #25
madfast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2010 Evo X MR-T
Location: NY
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
both roots and lysholm have bypass valves for part throttle and idle/cruise...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Type[R]+ View Post
The only problem with tvs/roots I can see is intercooling. Seems like a PITA to do it, where as with centrifugal, just whack in a air-water intercooler inline and away you go.
built in water to air intercooler FTW!!!


[u2b]9wpatO9rcQg[/u2b]

Last edited by madfast; 08-31-2011 at 03:31 AM.
madfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 03:58 AM   #26
Type[R]+
Senior Member
 
Type[R]+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: Lexus IS-F
Location: Australia
Posts: 529
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
looks like a good little set up there madfast. Is that production engine or aftermarket kit?
Type[R]+ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 10:32 AM   #27
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^^That's the GM LSJ engine, which uses an Eaton M62 and a W/A IC.

Supercharging is still my preferred choice of FI solely due to their proportional torque output vs. the Go pedal....aka the drivability is closest to naturally aspirated. TVS and twin-screw [various brands] are the most efficient currently available, however good ole Roots are better than nothing.

Forgotten it is most definitely not.

For the numbers queens, supercharging is still king; find me a passenger-car piston engine that makes more power than an NHRA Top Fuel dragster.


I'm totally fine with the FR-S being N/A, however if TRD wants to make a Warranteed supercharger kit I just might be interested.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 11:36 AM   #28
Random_Art
professional smartass
 
Random_Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: 16 speed mountain bike...
Location: Georgia
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
^^That's the GM LSJ engine, which uses an Eaton M62 and a W/A IC.

Supercharging is still my preferred choice of FI solely due to their proportional torque output vs. the Go pedal....aka the drivability is closest to naturally aspirated. TVS and twin-screw [various brands] are the most efficient currently available, however good ole Roots are better than nothing.

Forgotten it is most definitely not.

For the numbers queens, supercharging is still king; find me a passenger-car piston engine that makes more power than an NHRA Top Fuel dragster.


I'm totally fine with the FR-S being N/A, however if TRD wants to make a Warranteed supercharger kit I just might be interested.
This seems like an unfair comparison. Top fuel dragsters have engines that are essentially bored out blocks of iron, monster pistons, and no cooling. They also run off Nitromethane as opposed to gasoline or ethanol. You'd never see a factory engine come in a Supra with that kind of set up since they would be exploding left and right.

Though, I can see why a supercharger would be ideal for the drag strip. The instant throttle response would decimate a vehicle suffering turbo lag off the line.
__________________

Goodbye Celica, you served me well.

http://artsofrandomness.blogspot.com/
Random_Art is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roofline: Form over function. ft86cbx Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 15 04-24-2011 01:27 AM
more pics form Geneva 2010 Abflug FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 14 03-27-2010 09:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.