follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2011, 04:51 PM   #15
IRobot
Junior Member
 
IRobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Ford Focus
Location: England, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think the TT and FT86 will both be chasing the same buyers (in the UK at least). They're both 4 seat coupes and about the same size. FT86 might be a little bit cheaper though.


I forgot about the quattro though, that adds another 100kg and brings the weight of the TT up to 1360kg (2.0 TFSI).
IRobot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:05 PM   #16
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
In the USA, I can't imagine cross-shopping a TT to an FT-86. It'd be like comparing a MB S-Class to a Porsche Cayman.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:14 PM   #17
IRobot
Junior Member
 
IRobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Ford Focus
Location: England, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
In the USA, I can't imagine cross-shopping a TT to an FT-86. It'd be like comparing a MB S-Class to a Porsche Cayman.
Well, I had my eye on this little TT at my local Audi dealer, but I might just forget it and wait for the FT86:-


IRobot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:23 PM   #18
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ughk. TT = not serious about handling. They're also way too big and heavy for my money. Go pick up a copy of the latest EVO and read "The Knowledge" and they'll point you in the right direction for a coupe', if that's what you want. For TTS money you can get an Evora or 370Z, something that actually handles good.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:34 PM   #19
IRobot
Junior Member
 
IRobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Ford Focus
Location: England, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think the FT86 will struggle to better the 1260kg weight of the TT because of its 69% aluminium body.

The main "problem" is, the TT is FWD.
IRobot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:41 PM   #20
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The TT does not weigh that little here in the USA. The base TT coupe starts at 1470kg. Like I said, German cars are inherently overweight.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:45 PM   #21
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,057
Thanks: 7,733
Thanked 19,285 Times in 8,392 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRobot View Post
I think the FT86 will struggle to better the 1260kg weight of the TT because of its 69% aluminium body.

The main "problem" is, the TT is FWD.
correction. TT can be FWD. They do make Quatro
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:47 PM   #22
chulooz
Registered you sir
 
chulooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
The TT does not weigh that little here in the USA. The base TT coupe starts at 1470kg. Like I said, German cars are inherently overweight.
hah. Tell that to the Cayman R
chulooz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 06:05 PM   #23
IRobot
Junior Member
 
IRobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Ford Focus
Location: England, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
The TT does not weigh that little here in the USA. The base TT coupe starts at 1470kg. Like I said, German cars are inherently overweight.
Is that the 3.2 V6 ?

Here's the weights for all current variants:-
Attached Images
File Type: pdf TT Weights.pdf (241.9 KB, 152 views)
IRobot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 06:52 PM   #24
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
No, it's right there on AudiUSA's website; 2.0T 211HP quattro coupe = 1470kg

The Cayman R is overweight. 2855 lbs is light for a Cayman, but that makes it 0.44 Tons heavier than my Exige, and I still have A/C, a stereo, and actual interior door handles. There, I told it.

The Cayman is also longer and slightly taller than the FT-86 will be, all while having a shorter wheelbase. Not to mention the price and luxury level are slightly different, making it a perfect sports car for well-heeled people not crazy enough to be fun but still want to prove they're worth being part of society. It's a great all-a-rounder, in other words.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 07:28 PM   #25
chulooz
Registered you sir
 
chulooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryephile View Post
No, it's right there on AudiUSA's website; 2.0T 211HP quattro coupe = 1470kg

The Cayman R is overweight. 2855 lbs is light for a Cayman, but that makes it 0.44 Tons heavier than my Exige, and I still have A/C, a stereo, and actual interior door handles. There, I told it.

The Cayman is also longer and slightly taller than the FT-86 will be, all while having a shorter wheelbase. Not to mention the price and luxury level are slightly different, making it a perfect sports car for well-heeled people not crazy enough to be fun but still want to prove they're worth being part of society. It's a great all-a-rounder, in other words.
what are you talking about man? Its one of porches most capable platforms.
chulooz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 07:34 PM   #26
Ryephile
Hot Dog
 
Ryephile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: quicker than arghx7
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,316
Thanks: 103
Thanked 173 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You're right. That means it's still slightly more boring than it needs to be. It handles great, has great steering feel, and is almost fun.

When I get old and decrepit, I'll likely want one.
__________________
"Wisdom is a not a function of age, but a function of experience."
Just Say No to unqualified aftermarket products.
Ryephile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 11:42 PM   #27
blur
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
 
blur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: E36 5.7 V8
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 1,573
Thanks: 194
Thanked 198 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aki View Post
Advanced High-tensile strength steel (AHSS) keeps evolving, but it's something like 10-15% heavier than aluminum I think? But you're also able to keep things more compact with AHSS compared to aluminum, which is why it's used a lot in areas like the A, B and C-pillars in cars. Aluminum is also about 50% more expensive than high-tensile strength steel.
What kind of weight figure would you figure the FT86 could have then, if they used AHSS? Would it be lower or higher if they use aluminum, accounting for all the additional thickness needed for torsional rigidity?
__________________
I wish I was cool enough to have an FR-S
blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 12:14 AM   #28
serialk11r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by blur View Post
What kind of weight figure would you figure the FT86 could have then, if they used AHSS? Would it be lower or higher if they use aluminum, accounting for all the additional thickness needed for torsional rigidity?
I think it's hard to say, there are many many different alloys.

Common aerospace usage aluminum is 7075 or 7068, which have yield strengths around 80-90 kpsi. Some steel alloys can be up 350kpsi yield strength. Thus it appears steel can have a higher yield strength/density than the strongest commercially produced aluminum. Of course yield strength isn't the only thing that matters, but you can see that it could really go either way, depending on other properties or specific alloy.
serialk11r is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.