follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2016, 03:08 PM   #15
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantana frs View Post
Re combustion chamber deposits: I didn't see afr or cr of test engine in pdf.
It was controlled via ASTM D6201, there's no need to publish those parameters as they adhered to the already published standard.

https://www.astm.org/Standards/D6201.htm

Edit: Apparantly the issue is covered on page 17 of the report, the other buildups are due to the extra detergent basically 'sticking' to the head.

Quote:
Managing intake valve and combustion chamber deposits is a difficult balance of quantity of detergent
and the appropriate chemical composition of the polymers that remove carbon deposits on the desired
engine components. If the chemical composition is incorrect, deposits can form on the injector, back of
intake valves, and in the combustion chamber. The concentration of detergent within the fuel must also
be balanced since a low detergent concentration could result in higher intake valve deposits. A high
concentration of detergent could potentially cause deposits to form within the combustion chamber
and/or lead to intake valve sticking.
Part of the ASTM D6201 test protocol is to measure the deposit thickness and weight of the carbon
deposits in the combustion chamber to verify that excessive buildup has not occurred as a result of
adding more detergent. It is noted that in the TOP TIER acceptance testing, fuels are also screened
against test scenarios for excessive detergent build up that could cause intake valve sticking and/or
excessive increase of combustion chamber deposits.
Considering this test proves that top tier 'washes away' old buildup, it's probably best to alternate high detergent and low detergent fuels to minimize buildup.

Oh and drive the piss out of it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly

Last edited by strat61caster; 07-10-2016 at 03:19 PM.
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
Cole (07-10-2016), FRSBRZGT86FAN (07-10-2016), Teseo (07-10-2016)
Old 07-10-2016, 03:11 PM   #16
Teseo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: frs
Location: Gunsai
Posts: 4,954
Thanks: 7,467
Thanked 2,980 Times in 1,802 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantana frs View Post
Use good gasoline
The problem is which. We are bombarded with bull crap ads and is difficult to identify the good one.
Teseo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2016, 03:28 PM   #17
Lantana frs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Drives: 13 frs red
Location: Lantana fl
Posts: 448
Thanks: 51
Thanked 198 Times in 115 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teseo View Post
The problem is which. We are bombarded with bull crap ads and is difficult to identify the good one.
Imo individual gas stations play a real life role as well; how old is the gas you're buying from a low volume mom and pop? Its been so hot here that my car feels like a mid sixties bug anyway. Again, the racetrac 93 has not caused any red flags per my oft.
Lantana frs is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lantana frs For This Useful Post:
Teseo (07-10-2016)
Old 07-10-2016, 04:22 PM   #18
guybo
Huge E85 fan!
 
guybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 539
Thanked 1,010 Times in 605 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Am I the only one who thinks the study reads like an ad? A real study is pretty dry, this one reads like a full page ad with the non-relevant pictures and fluff that's included.

I don't know what the angle for AAA would be, but they work with The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers who support the top tiers fuel initiative which is something that the big oil companies don't support. I'd like to know who paid to have this study done and why they don't address the INCREASE of certain deposits with the top tier fuels in the study. The study focuses very strongly on the dramatic decreases in intake valve deposits, but glazes over the increases in cylinder head deposits.
guybo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to guybo For This Useful Post:
jcw99 (07-10-2016)
Old 07-10-2016, 05:24 PM   #19
mdm
not a twin owner
 
mdm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2016 Veloster Turbo DCT
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 734
Thanks: 992
Thanked 463 Times in 267 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by guybo View Post
Am I the only one who thinks the study reads like an ad? A real study is pretty dry, this one reads like a full page ad with the non-relevant pictures and fluff that's included.

I don't know what the angle for AAA would be, but they work with The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers who support the top tiers fuel initiative which is something that the big oil companies don't support. I'd like to know who paid to have this study done and why they don't address the INCREASE of certain deposits with the top tier fuels in the study. The study focuses very strongly on the dramatic decreases in intake valve deposits, but glazes over the increases in cylinder head deposits.

Maybe a bit, but keep in mind that this a release for general public. Even with the fluff and pictures some people here (car enthusiasts!) refused to read it. How many would read the actual study, with technical language, formulas, and dry language.

The cylinder head deposits are barely larger with top tier, though I'd expct more discussion of them.

What I am trying to say is that there may something going on here along the lines you are suggesting, but it does not seem too excessive. Not worse than any "independent" car test in a magazine
mdm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mdm For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (07-10-2016), Tcoat (07-10-2016)
Old 07-10-2016, 06:01 PM   #20
guybo
Huge E85 fan!
 
guybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 539
Thanked 1,010 Times in 605 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm View Post
Maybe a bit, but keep in mind that this a release for general public. Even with the fluff and pictures some people here (car enthusiasts!) refused to read it. How many would read the actual study, with technical language, formulas, and dry language.

The cylinder head deposits are barely larger with top tier, though I'd expct more discussion of them.

What I am trying to say is that there may something going on here along the lines you are suggesting, but it does not seem too excessive. Not worse than any "independent" car test in a magazine
Don't get me started with car magazines! They are the most biased, bought and paid for "independent" reviews in the world.
guybo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to guybo For This Useful Post:
mdm (07-10-2016), Tcoat (07-10-2016)
Old 07-10-2016, 06:58 PM   #21
Lantana frs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Drives: 13 frs red
Location: Lantana fl
Posts: 448
Thanks: 51
Thanked 198 Times in 115 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Imo there are too many factors that could explain combustion chamber deposits. I just want to put the shit in my tank and not worry about knock.
Lantana frs is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lantana frs For This Useful Post:
Braces (07-11-2016), guybo (07-10-2016), Tcoat (07-10-2016)
Old 07-10-2016, 10:32 PM   #22
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Guys, page 17 discusses the combustion chamber deposits.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2016, 10:47 PM   #23
Teseo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: frs
Location: Gunsai
Posts: 4,954
Thanks: 7,467
Thanked 2,980 Times in 1,802 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
93 oct race fuels and redline seems more reliable then
Teseo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2016, 10:49 AM   #24
Braces
Senior Member
 
Braces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 17 Alfa Romeo 4C
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 987
Thanks: 570
Thanked 711 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantana frs View Post
Imo there are too many factors that could explain combustion chamber deposits. I just want to put the shit in my tank and not worry about knock.
Exactly. I've never owned a car long enough to really care.

Now ... once I decide on a car that I will keep for a LONG time. I will let her drink the best sauce around.
__________________
My 2013 Firestorm Red 13 FRS is gone. Bought the next best thing: 2017 Alfa Romeo 4C
Braces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2016, 10:49 AM   #25
mav1178
Senior Member
 
mav1178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2005 Toyota Camry
Location: 91745
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 493
Thanked 6,099 Times in 3,030 Posts
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Th3rdSun View Post
No way I'm reading through all of that. Anyone have the Cliff's Notes version?
It's not hard to find what you need, especially since it's on the 2nd page...

Quote:
Key Findings:
1. The test engine operated on a TOP TIER gasoline averaged 19 times fewer intake valve
deposits than when it was operated on non- TOP TIER gasoline. (based on the ASTM D6201
test - TOP TIER gasoline averaged 34.1mg of deposits per intake valve versus non- TOP TIER
average of 660.6mg)
2. Based upon secondary research findings, long-term use of a gasoline without an enhanced
additive package can lead to reductions in fuel economy of 2-4%, drivability issues, and
increased emissions.
© 2016 American Automobile Association, Inc. 3
3. In most cases, carbon deposits can be reduced or removed from critical engine components
1
by switching to a gasoline that meets TOP TIER standards.
4. Approximately six in ten drivers (63%) believe there is a difference in the quality of gasoline
sold by retailers, yet only (12%) of drivers purchase gasoline based upon its detergent
additive package. The primary motivation for choosing a particular gas station is location /
convenience (75%), followed closely by the price of the fuel (73%).
5. Most TOP TIER gasolines do not cost significantly more than non-TOP TIER gasoline. The
average price difference between the TOP TIER and non-TOP TIER brands surveyed was
three cents per gallon over a 12-month period.
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2016, 02:43 PM   #26
FR-Sky
Senior Member
 
FR-Sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: 2013 FR-S 10 series [755]
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 385
Thanked 390 Times in 264 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Toyota said 91,,then i fill my car with 91.
Its not a brain surgery. Do what the manufacture said.
FR-Sky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2016, 06:29 PM   #27
G-awesome
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2015 Firestorm Scion FRS
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 534
Thanks: 371
Thanked 230 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
considering I'm tuning and testing out the brands of gas in my city...this is an informative report! Reading it as I type...
G-awesome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 02:59 AM   #28
xFury
Senior Member
 
xFury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Drives: '16 Scion FR-S - Oceanic
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 203
Thanks: 102
Thanked 43 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Costco gas is good enough for me. They're always busy and usually get delivery quite often. Price is good and Top tier is a plus.

But I do believe in using good gasoline IMO.
xFury is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Costco Gas now Top Tier N1rve Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 22 04-15-2014 07:19 PM
Scion FR-S Convertible Still Under Study vh_supra26 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 10 01-26-2014 09:12 PM
Maritz Research Study? Marcoscrdo Mid-Atlantic 18 03-14-2013 02:40 PM
Anybody else get the New Vehicle Experience Study jduffy BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 6 11-06-2012 12:26 AM
Companies supplying top-tier gasoline in the USA and Canada FRiSson Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 30 10-11-2012 05:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.