follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2010, 12:41 AM   #169
NESW20
2.1L 3SGTE
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MR2 Turbo & Tacoma
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 29
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
near Valencia/Palmdale. great roads with little to no traffic! i won't name them publicly though...

-Mike
__________________
1991 MR2 Turbo - 2.1L high compression stroker 3SGTE
2006 Tacoma 4x4 TRD Off Road - All-Pro front bumper, Old Man Emu shocks, Old Man Emu HD front coils, All-Pro leafs
1990 240SX Coupe - sold
2008 Civic Si Sedan
NESW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 07:38 PM   #170
ddoouugg
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: RSX
Location: L.A.
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
ooo. Care to pm me?
ddoouugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 01:32 PM   #171
himbo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: Lightening Red BRZ Ltd.
Location: North Jersey Mutha Luva!!!
Posts: 226
Thanks: 67
Thanked 95 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hey everyone! Here are some of my thoughts with regards to some of the things that were said. If the car really is under 2800-2900 lbs, you're not going to need balls of torque to move it. My '08 Impreza make 170 lb/tq, and weighs 3k+lbs and can still do the hustle. Lightweight and and a decent torque curve will make determine how well it moves around.

Secondly, I really hope they will keep the boxer layout. You really feel low center of gravity. Its tough to explain, but I know my Subie bros can vouch for me. Plus, even with equal length headers, there's still a distinct rumble and feel to that way the motor sounds and behaves. And my car is BONE stock! If this does become a high power motor, then a boxer motor would be nice because they are extremely smooth as they climb the rev range. This is just a natural property of the way they are balanced.

Finally, as much as I would love to see 100hp/lt (I love that magical figure!!!!), I don't think it will happen if the car is set to cost under $24K. High hp NA motors that burn cleanly and get decent mileage are not going to be very cost efficient. If I am not mistaken, I believe that car companies have to reduce their average emission and consumption of their fleets, so I wonder if this is the logical way to go. This is why I believe that a 2L motor will not make 200hp. Who knows, they might go F/I But hey, 170hp out of a 2L is still lots of fun on a car that weighs under 3k lbs!

I'm not saying that this is how things will be, just some things to be taken into consideration. Flame suit on and awaiting ass rapage
himbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 05:18 PM   #172
Midship Runabout
formerly Dixie Normous
 
Midship Runabout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: The ladies wild!
Location: ())_)CRAYOLA)_))>
Posts: 996
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by himbo View Post
awaiting ass rapage
So is lex
Midship Runabout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 05:40 PM   #173
Matador
hashiryu
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Drives: Mk4 Supra
Location: Probably mucking around in an engine bay
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 18
Thanked 37 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dixie Normous View Post
So is lex

Matador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2010, 11:41 PM   #174
Franisco
Senior Member
 
Franisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: D31a
Location: 360
Posts: 502
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by himbo View Post
You really feel the low center of gravity.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
No one's buying a Yaris to wind the piss out of it and possibly slam into a mountainside pretending they're the ultimate Tofu delivery person.
Franisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 01:49 AM   #175
himbo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: Lightening Red BRZ Ltd.
Location: North Jersey Mutha Luva!!!
Posts: 226
Thanks: 67
Thanked 95 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
^^^ Indeed LOL
himbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 02:36 AM   #176
NESW20
2.1L 3SGTE
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MR2 Turbo & Tacoma
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 29
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by himbo View Post
Finally, as much as I would love to see 100hp/lt (I love that magical figure!!!!), I don't think it will happen if the car is set to cost under $24K.
http://automobiles.honda.com/civic-si-sedan/



-Mike
__________________
1991 MR2 Turbo - 2.1L high compression stroker 3SGTE
2006 Tacoma 4x4 TRD Off Road - All-Pro front bumper, Old Man Emu shocks, Old Man Emu HD front coils, All-Pro leafs
1990 240SX Coupe - sold
2008 Civic Si Sedan
NESW20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 02:25 PM   #177
himbo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: Lightening Red BRZ Ltd.
Location: North Jersey Mutha Luva!!!
Posts: 226
Thanks: 67
Thanked 95 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NESW20 View Post
I knew someone would get on it! LOL I believe RWD tends to be a bit more expensive to produce- and the K20 is an older motor, so I don't think it complies with all the upcoming emissions and consumption standards. I believe new motors will have to comply with the new regs, which won't be cheap.
himbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 02:26 AM   #178
mrtodd
Techmology.
 
mrtodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: Scrapped project EH2
Location: Teh Mountains
Posts: 137
Thanks: 40
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by himbo View Post
I knew someone would get on it! LOL I believe RWD tends to be a bit more expensive to produce- and the K20 is an older motor, so I don't think it complies with all the upcoming emissions and consumption standards. I believe new motors will have to comply with the new regs, which won't be cheap.

You don't think the K20Z3 would comply with upcoming 2012 Emissions? It's currently running at LEV-2 standards.. Not too bad IMHO. Pretty sure it wouldn't be difficult to bring it to PZEV levels with some Honda factory tinkering.

But the fact of the matter is that there ARE engine manufactures out there that still know how to make a damn good engine available for ~$24k, in terms of power.. Honda is one, and Toyota is another. Subaru, on the other hand, have never mass-produced an N/A engine (to the consumer market) that meets the 100hp/liter ratio. I personally think they rely too much on their turbos to get the numbers up...

I really hope that Toyota does some magic on the heads for this silly little boxer engine, because seriously, the N/A variant 2.0L boxer is pretty damn weak compared to other N/A 2.0's out there.
mrtodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 04:30 AM   #179
chulooz
Registered you sir
 
chulooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: 99 impreza coupe
Location: DC / CT
Posts: 1,666
Thanks: 259
Thanked 380 Times in 207 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I agree with you on their less than market topping hp/L numbers, but they do make nice amounts of TQ when it counts, something neither the toyota or honda engines are famous for. Truthfully I am hoping for a boosted variant to really wake this car up.
chulooz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 06:02 AM   #180
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtodd View Post
You don't think the K20Z3 would comply with upcoming 2012 Emissions? It's currently running at LEV-2 standards.. Not too bad IMHO. Pretty sure it wouldn't be difficult to bring it to PZEV levels with some Honda factory tinkering.

But the fact of the matter is that there ARE engine manufactures out there that still know how to make a damn good engine available for ~$24k, in terms of power.. Honda is one, and Toyota is another. Subaru, on the other hand, have never mass-produced an N/A engine (to the consumer market) that meets the 100hp/liter ratio. I personally think they rely too much on their turbos to get the numbers up...

I really hope that Toyota does some magic on the heads for this silly little boxer engine, because seriously, the N/A variant 2.0L boxer is pretty damn weak compared to other N/A 2.0's out there.
Oh I do agree that hp/l for Subie sux... but don't forget, it's awd. I can't think of any Honda or Toyota engine that had i4, 2.5l or smaller, NA, AWD car that had better hp/l then Subie. I stand to be corrected.

I'm pretty sure if Subaru didn't have to worry bout AWD so much, they could of made good hp/l engine.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 10:34 AM   #181
Decameron
Member
 
Decameron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Drives: 2002 Toyota Echo M/T
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
Oh I do agree that hp/l for Subie sux... but don't forget, it's awd. I can't think of any Honda or Toyota engine that had i4, 2.5l or smaller, NA, AWD car that had better hp/l then Subie. I stand to be corrected.

I'm pretty sure if Subaru didn't have to worry bout AWD so much, they could of made good hp/l engine.
Is that because AWD generally requires more torque? Therefore forcing subie to tune their engines to give more torque while sacrificing HP?
Decameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 05:28 PM   #182
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 21,053
Thanks: 7,730
Thanked 19,281 Times in 8,389 Posts
Mentioned: 697 Post(s)
Tagged: 28 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decameron View Post
Is that because AWD generally requires more torque? Therefore forcing subie to tune their engines to give more torque while sacrificing HP?
That's the general thoughts and from what I've seen on JDM awd cars... I have seen k-car 4wd, like Subaru Vivio with only max hp of 63, but of course it had 75tq.

but that's all my speculation.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FT-86 Concept to be unveiled at Toyota Metapolis on 10/23 ahead of Tokyo Motor Show! Hachiroku Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 8 12-16-2011 12:19 AM
Live pics and videos of Toyota FT-86 from Tokyo Motor Show (compilation)! Hachiroku FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 67 10-31-2011 09:09 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.