06-27-2018, 11:07 AM | #1751 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You can t improve mechanically the 26ms opening of PI. Tell your tuner to reduce it and augment DI
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (06-27-2018) |
06-27-2018, 11:20 AM | #1752 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: Europe
Posts: 919
Thanks: 369
Thanked 554 Times in 301 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Even if the tuning is out of your hands, providing feedback and/or asking critical questions to the tuner is not (before forking out 1000 of $ to correct a possible non-issue). I assume it was the quest for help with this feedback/critical questioning that prompted you to ask the question in "software tuning" and not "Engine, Exhaust, Transmission". As such, my advice to log what their custom stuff is doing still stands, as they will have a better chance of spotting if it's doing something unintentional. Also, given the long "injection end of DI to spark", it might be worth logging "DI injection angle". If the fuel is injected early, combined with the large VVT overlap, is it possible that it's flushing some of the fuel right through the combustion chamber? Another option is to let another tuner give it a go. Like HRI tuning which has a lot of experience with FI. This won't cost you a lot, as you already have a license and the hardware required. Or you could start out by sending an inquiry if he thinks your setup should work without upgrading the fuel system. This is not to discredit DT at all, as they have tons of experience and I have a lot of respect for them. But maybe their stuff just doesn't work in your case for whatever reason. I suppose you are getting the tuning done remotely, and it might be difficult for them to pinpoint the problem and it's easier to suggest for you to upgrade your fuel system. In general, remote tuning is a premade tune canned tune, that is lightly adjusted to fit the individual car as the tuner will have time constraints how much time they can spend on each customer to keep a profitable business. If approaching the tuning of your car with another methodology might solve your problem without the requirement for hardware upgrades it could potentially save you a lot of money. Maybe it's worth spending 400$ to try an alternative solution before buying new injectors etc. Like you started out saying, the stock fuel system should be able to handle 11 psi boost.
__________________
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tor For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (06-27-2018) |
06-27-2018, 11:48 AM | #1753 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,806 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I appreciate the response.
My main reason for the post was to determine if my tune could elicit what is my hardware problem. Most of what your saying is frankly going over my head. I trust them with the tuning side of things, but I’ll definitely explore all my option like you suggested before throwing money at replacing parts. For now, I am fine with the low boost pulley. The 11-12 psi pulley made the car a beast; I can hardly imagine the rods surviving long at that level, regardless of what people may claim the car can handle. I’m more comfortable at the lower boost pulley, yet I would like to address the fueling issue, if there is a problem. Maybe it is not an issue stock or with the low boost pulley, but there must be a problem. I may end up looking into checking out the fuel pump filter like ai mentioned. Reading the pages I have seen pics of some gummed up filters. Who knows if the previous owner used e85 or put some additives or cleaners in the fuel.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
06-27-2018, 12:43 PM | #1754 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Also with the low pulley actually the PI opening is a bit too high. If you trust them just ask them why they are keeping PI duty so high that the time of opening goes over what ecutek reccomends and why they don t use more DI since it has a lot of room still
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (06-28-2018) |
06-28-2018, 04:18 PM | #1755 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,806 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The car feels really good and smooth on boost. There are some times where the car has some delay or hesitation. This is off the line with low throttle input. Seems like gas is applied then there is a given amount of power then suddenly there is a surge of power, and it rapidly drops off. I don't know if this is the valve sticking on the supercharger, or some threshold where it isn't opening until then suddenly does or a variance in throttle position that is leading to a change in mapping or the valve. I usually have to give it some extra gas then back off as it surges then when it subsides a second in I can add more throttle, or I have to just take off faster with more input, and then it is smooth. I'd rather not drive like an ass 24/7 though. It is definitely manageable, but not smooth. I don't know if it is possible the clutch is slipping then engaging, but it doesn't smell or skip. The other time is when the car is in 6th gear at 65-70; adding throttle input (not WOT, just partial) at this time gives little feedback--less feedback than stock for passing in these situations. Sure, I could downshift, but I was assuming I would have more power in all situations from stock. https://datazap.me/u/jirace/new-pulls?log=0&data=29
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
06-29-2018, 09:22 AM | #1756 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: Supercharged 2016 CBS BRZ
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 55
Thanks: 29
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Hey guys, I noticed a loss of power in my BRZ and my tuner said it may be due to an DI or cylinder misfire issue. I logged the #1-4 Cylinder Misfire parameters and I see a "1" in the "Maximum" column for cylinder 3. All the other cylinders have 0s. Does this "1" in the maximum column mean cylinder 3 is misfiring? I'm using Ecutek so I thought this thread might be able to help.
|
07-19-2018, 02:01 PM | #1757 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2014 FR-S
Location: NorCal
Posts: 164
Thanks: 61
Thanked 123 Times in 69 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Bad missfires breaking up at 3-3.5k
https://datazap.me/u/genruleathumb/b...zoom=1928-2293 https://datazap.me/u/genruleathumb/b...zoom=5869-6928 High negative fuel trims JRSC C38 91 Octane Delicious Tune Not tune related as it manifested itself lately Any help appreciated |
07-21-2018, 01:03 AM | #1758 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Drives: TRD R.S. 1.0 FRS
Location: California
Posts: 181
Thanks: 87
Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
weird spike in fuel trims for a few minutes.
OFT V4.03 E85 tune. spikes to 13-14 for a few minutes. was worried. but it stabilizes. Im assuming my E85 was just very high ethanol content im assuming. Any insight will be appreciated. thanks https://datazap.me/u/bboyairrick/wtf...7-8-9-10-13-14 |
07-30-2018, 12:49 AM | #1759 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,806 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@Tor
Hey man, I received a new tune that dramatically improved tip in response, low speed and low throttle behavior, and there seemed to be more power too. I don’t know what was changed from previous tunes, but it made a nice difference. Here is the log from a WOT pull which felt on par to the norm: https://datazap.me/u/jirace/after-ne...29-46-49-50-52 Then I got a revision that left the behavior of the last tune intact but felt a little less powerful at the expense of smoothness in delivery. At least these were what the butt and foot felt. Here is the log: https://datazap.me/u/jirace/tune-ref...23-29-49-50-51 I was curious if things look as good as they feel, and more importantly, if there is evidence of a fuel problem or inadequacy. I’d like to go back to the smaller 85mm pulley, but I don’t if there is a problem with the tune or fuel. I’d be willing to upgrade the port injectors or fuel pump if necessary. I added a few parameters; is 90% fuel pump duty normal at WOT. Also, the total fuel Pi and Di seem to fluctuate a lot at the top even if AFR is flat.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
07-30-2018, 04:26 AM | #1760 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
DI is still underused while PI is at his limit almost
afr is ok because they activated CL fuel control with ecutek racerom v10 fuel pump duty is normal i got more total fuel quantity from a restricted hks v2 SC kit, with stock pump stock injectors so i dont think you have problems, it is just the tune that is horrible who is your tuner, I forgot? your tune looks so bad that I want to be sure to stay away from him |
The Following User Says Thank You to tomm.brz For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (07-31-2018) |
07-30-2018, 05:54 AM | #1761 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I dont think it racerom 10 closed loop fueling as the short termand long term trims are both zero.
It looks like standard open loop eith ltft disabled Sonething serms strange with fueling with the pi and di quantities flapping up and down after half way through run Could possibly be di comluter not grounded correctly make sure all bolts inserted and tight. Or fuel pump pressure issue low pressure pump in tank Or somthing very weird in tune |
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (07-31-2018) |
07-30-2018, 06:08 AM | #1762 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
@steve99 look at cl fuel. Correction %.. That s racerom v10 enabled.. And they got abad maf scaling too cause the correction is always 10% of worse
also CL statu is 31, 31 means closed loop of racerom v10 activated cl rr10 doesnt use neither short term or long term to apply corrections They just enabled cl on rr10 to have a good afr but all the rest is just bad, they should. Reduce PI and put more DI to start with PI time is over 16ms, while DI end ms is almost 5ms, DI has sooo much room still The vvt cam setting look stupid too and ign timings are pretty low Last edited by tomm.brz; 07-30-2018 at 07:28 AM. |
07-31-2018, 02:43 AM | #1763 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,806 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
||
07-31-2018, 03:19 AM | #1764 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 502
Thanked 1,070 Times in 778 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
omg...
they improved your tune by reducing PI, but they should reduce even more because 16 ms of PI opening is too much DI is underused maf scaling is bad, with a constant correction of more than 10% by raceromV10 how would be concerned also at how they set up engine load limits, the "tip in" leaning you re getting could also be because of that and that is causing a lot of flkc at low rpm |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RGM Supercharged 86 performance data | TheGooseman | AFRICA | 14 | 12-13-2014 01:15 AM |
Interpreting Ecutek Data Logs? | cuddefred | Software Tuning | 3 | 09-02-2013 12:55 PM |
VIR - Impressions/Pics/Logs/Video (Track Daze) | swift996 | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 39 | 08-30-2013 09:21 AM |
Noise tube delete air/fuel logs? | jm1681 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 13 | 10-17-2012 04:57 PM |
ECU Data Logger | Motordyne | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 5 | 07-18-2012 09:27 AM |