Innovate (Sprintex) Supercharger Owners Topic

[Khorne]

So got my other radium can to install, the crankcase one not the PCV.

Am i correct in thinking just take the line off the inlet near the throttlebody and affix the can in between the host and the inlet?

[DeliciousTuning]

Originally Posted by Dustin

Got my E85 map the other day from Delicious. Could not get it to duplicate the problem while running the E60 or E85 map. Seems to confirm the low ethanol content being at least an issue if not the issue.

I'm running 70mm pulley intercooled as well.

I got the 70mm pulley on today (UPS was suppose to deliver on Friday and had a shipping delay), but been testing on E80 right now with no issues. As soon as that is gone I am back to 91 octane and further testing which I assume will show it ugly head.

Just an update to let you know we are testing away on the hiccup at 5K.

I have to say I am getting addicted to this 70mm pulley, it feels nice.

Cheers,
William Knose
Delicious Tuning

[CK_Bladesmith]

Originally Posted by DeliciousTuning

I got the 70mm pulley on today (UPS was suppose to deliver on Friday and had a shipping delay), but been testing on E80 right now with no issues. As soon as that is gone I am back to 91 octane and further testing which I assume will show it ugly head.



Just an update to let you know we are testing away on the hiccup at 5K.



I have to say I am getting addicted to this 70mm pulley, it feels nice.



Cheers,

William Knose

Delicious Tuning

Put my 75mm pulley on the car for the first time the other day just to see how much power I lost....the 70mm was back on about an hour later. Yeah....70mm for the win

[DeliciousTuning]

Originally Posted by CK_Bladesmith

Put my 75mm pulley on the car for the first time the other day just to see how much power I lost....the 70mm was back on about an hour later. Yeah....70mm for the win

Yeah I was not really expecting much, yeah was a poorly mistaking. Now I want a smaller pulley, if possible. We are looking into it a bit to see what is possible and reliable.

Have some JDL equal length headers to try out also with the kit. I think that should be a nice upgrade. But that will come in time.

[mikalem]

Originally Posted by DeliciousTuning

I got the 70mm pulley on today (UPS was suppose to deliver on Friday and had a shipping delay), but been testing on E80 right now with no issues. As soon as that is gone I am back to 91 octane and further testing which I assume will show it ugly head.

Just an update to let you know we are testing away on the hiccup at 5K.

I have to say I am getting addicted to this 70mm pulley, it feels nice.

Cheers,
William Knose
Delicious Tuning

I didn't see any issues with E82 registered, so that's not surprising to me. I'm down to E12 registered on the tank and while I can get the car now to just sputter a bit in the 5K range, it didn't actually throw the code. I'm interested to see how it behaves once this tank is completely gone and I'm back on just pure (ish) 93. I do miss E85 though, it's a pretty big power difference in the car!

[choi0706]

Originally Posted by DeliciousTuning

Yeah I was not really expecting much, yeah was a poorly mistaking. Now I want a smaller pulley, if possible. We are looking into it a bit to see what is possible and reliable.

Have some JDL equal length headers to try out also with the kit. I think that should be a nice upgrade. But that will come in time.

thoughts on a nameless header?

[DeliciousTuning]

Originally Posted by choi0706

thoughts on a nameless header?

For the price, you can likely get the same or better performance from a JDL EL header. Perhaps we're a bit biased though.

Sincerely,

Zach
Delicious Tuning

[Drift-Office]

Originally Posted by DeliciousTuning

As we have been doing for quite some time now we run our DI system to its full potential first and foremost and then add in PI as needed. This is much different approach and I believe something that only Delicious Tuning offers currently and something we are working with our lawyers on for an official Copyright.

Cheers,
William Knose
Delicious Tuning

Mr. Knose (Bill)

Seeing how ECUTEK (a propriety that you do not own,) is available to the rest of us tuners, and within said software, is an option that we all are able to use and recreate various calibrations, good luck with that.

Now that said, if it's a specific ratio you're commanding and you feel that you're the only one that's using DI "at it's full potential", then I should probably dig up some of our older revisions that predate Delicious being on the scene and maybe claim that as part of our tuning philosophy / copyright?

...

Nah.

Cheers,


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC

[RedLeader]

This is about to turn into a pissing match between tuners, which makes them both look like shit.

[Drift-Office]

Originally Posted by RedLeader

This is about to turn into a pissing match between tuners, which makes them both look like shit.

I'm not here for that gents. I think the work I've done on this forum has proven that.

No, I don't have the inclination, ambition or ego to believe that if I can think of it, no one else can. After all, we're all using the same software, all with the same options, all with dynos and years of R&D time to show our worth... But to say that you own that idea, is a bit much to stomach.

FYI, I don't sell anything on this forum, only post my results so you can take that for what it's worth.

My 2 cents!


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC


EDIT : Not going to thread jack this, please continue if you will... as you were!

[s2d4]

That's why I like Bob.

[DeliciousTuning]

Hi Bob,

Thanks for your comment. You are correct I do not have proprietary rights to it, never have, never will and like I have stated before since I do not have any rights to it, I can not patent what was created from it. But like creating a photo from a camera, I do not have proprietary rights to the camera, but the way I use the camera can be unique and what is created from that camera, the photo, can be copyrighted and that is was we are attempting to do. Sure others can figure out what has been done in time but I have yet to see it duplicated so until then why not see what is possible.

I have been around long enough to see when you are the first to attempt something different, you are scolded by your fellow piers for thinking outside the box. But as soon as you prove it to be a viable solution, it is immediately copied, reproduced and the predecessor to all that work goes unnoticed. It is the industry, it is life, and you can ask EcuTeK all about it, as they know this all to well. Does a copyright even really protect anything, not really, so why I am attempting, because I want to know what is possible and understand a little more about protecting my intellectual property to the best of my ability.

Take for a moment that maybe most tuners look inside the box that is provided to them and the first question out of most of their mouths is what are ranges or for that matter limitations on what can be done? I consider myself a good tuner, and have seen many better but I do like to think of tuning as a video game. Like a video game it is fun, I can play with it all day long but the best part is finding those little holes in the software and exploiting them to their full potential. That is what allows us tuners to create something unique and do something different.

Being a computer science engineer and having worked on Subaru ECU's since 1999, there is a consistency to them, even though they evolve, the base is very similar. Just maybe EcuTeK RaceROM is cooler then we all think it really is.

Cheers,
William Knose
Delicious Tuning

[s2d4]

OT but what's a computer science engineer? is that equivalent to a software engineer or computer science?

[clayrush]

Originally Posted by s2d4

OT but what's a computer science engineer? is that equivalent to a software engineer or computer science?

I think computer science and computer engineer are considered separate fields or disciplines. But are related?