follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

View Poll Results: 17x9 -VS- 18x9
17x9 43 66.15%
18x9 22 33.85%
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-18-2013, 12:53 PM   #1
hmong337
Emperor JDM
 
hmong337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
17x9 -VS- 18x9 Square

I'm debating between these two sizes for next spring.

17x9 +35 w/ 245/40r17 or 255/40r17
18x9 +35 w/ 245/40r18 or 255/35r18

Both have their pros and cons but which one should I go for and why?
__________________
hmong337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:01 PM   #2
FR-S Matt
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmong337 View Post
I'm debating between these two sizes for next spring.

17x9 +35 w/ 245/40r17 or 255/40r17
18x9 +35 w/ 245/40r18 or 255/35r18

Both have their pros and cons but which one should I go for and why?
18X9 looks\performance slight weight difference.
17X9 performance
FR-S Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:17 PM   #3
PERRIN_Chris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 770
Thanks: 450
Thanked 536 Times in 316 Posts
Mentioned: 137 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Send a message via AIM to PERRIN_Chris
I'd say 17s, generally it will weigh less overall, and will be cheaper! But if you don't care about performance much, 18s will probably look a little better.
PERRIN_Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:20 PM   #4
Turkish
Serial Cone Killer
 
Turkish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '14 BRZ - WRB Premium 6MT
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,326
Thanks: 1,081
Thanked 656 Times in 441 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
The 18's will look nicer, but for me, I'd go with 17's because they weigh less and the thicker sidewalls mean that road imperfections won't be as rough on the ass bones. In the end, go with what your gut tells you, you are probably leaning more towards one or the other. Go with your stomach, it's hungry.
__________________
For those who hear him call...

... his name is...

C'THULHU
Turkish is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Turkish For This Useful Post:
jkamelo (01-03-2021)
Old 12-18-2013, 01:20 PM   #5
FR-S Matt
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I compared Enkei RPF1's in 18X9.5 and 17X9 and the weight difference isn't too much, a couple pounds. The size of the wheel though on the other hand creates more rotational mass which might actually make the car work a bit more to get the wheels turning. Not sure how accurate that is, but it seems to be the case.
FR-S Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:23 PM   #6
Killerbee
Senior Member
 
Killerbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: GR86 / Supra MK5 MT / MR-S / Z4
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 836
Thanks: 593
Thanked 725 Times in 342 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I'd go for 18", however tires should be 245/35/18 if you want it as near as possible to stock diameter
Killerbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:26 PM   #7
hmong337
Emperor JDM
 
hmong337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Well, I'm all about doing things classy but functional. I'm sort of leaning towards the 17's as they'll be lighter and cheaper to run for the long term. They just don't grab your attention as the 18's do. The 18's look quite a bit nicer but at the expense of weight and the cost of tires can be signifcantly more.

My car is a daily driver that may see a small amount of lapping days per year.
__________________
hmong337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 01:29 PM   #8
G_Ride
Senior Member
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 769
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PERRIN_Chris View Post
I'd say 17s, generally it will weigh less overall, and will be cheaper! But if you don't care about performance much, 18s will probably look a little better.
This
G_Ride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 02:25 PM   #9
djdnz
1337
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ WRB S/C
Location: San Jose, CA / Waterloo, ON
Posts: 1,134
Thanks: 776
Thanked 482 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I picked 18's because 17's don't look big enough in my eyes for the car.
djdnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 02:32 PM   #10
hmong337
Emperor JDM
 
hmong337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killerbee View Post
I'd go for 18", however tires should be 245/35/18 if you want it as near as possible to stock diameter
I'm a meaty tire kinda guy.
__________________
hmong337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 02:56 PM   #11
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmong337 View Post
I'm debating between these two sizes for next spring.

17x9 +35 w/ 245/40r17 or 255/40r17
18x9 +35 w/ 245/40r18 or 255/35r18

Both have their pros and cons but which one should I go for and why?
It'll help a lot if you list what you plan to do with the car, and also what you feel the pros and cons are for you.

If you want pure performance for a time attack type situation, you're better off with 8" wide rims with 225's.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 04:15 PM   #12
hmong337
Emperor JDM
 
hmong337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
It'll help a lot if you list what you plan to do with the car, and also what you feel the pros and cons are for you.

If you want pure performance for a time attack type situation, you're better off with 8" wide rims with 225's.
I'm not a fan of buying twice. An 8" width rim with 225's?! Might as well just keep the stockers lol. Sorry but that's not what I'm looking for. Even if I was time attacking with the stock car, I would just stick with the stock wheels and wrap them with sticky 225's

The car will be a DD with little track time. Eventually, it will be turned turboed so may as well go for the wheel size that'll accomidate that. Plus, 9" width on all four corners looks business. I'd rather have too much grip than not enough.

I guess I can say that the cost of tires is pretty important to me when talking long term. A 17x9 with a 245 would probably be most economical in terms of performance per dollar. But 18"s look more satisfying. That's the delimma I'm having. Aesthetics versus running costs. I may not be satisfied with the look of a 17x9; whereas, 255/35r18's can rack up a tire tab quite quickly.

I may have to flip a coin with this one. The votes so far are pretty even too lol.
__________________
hmong337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2013, 04:41 PM   #13
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
^^ Wider != more grip... sticky tires need heat to generate full grip, and going too wide can actually give you less grip because they won't get warm enough. My 17x8's with 225's weigh less than stock, and are WAY stickier, plus a 225 will perform better on an 8" rim than a 7" rim.

IMO, forgetting budget, you should go for the 18's since you seem to be looking more for how they look than ultimate performance on a track.

If you want to consider the long term budget, your best bet is to get a set of 17x9's for track tires and then whatever you think looks good for the street with average summer tires. Sticky tires won't last that long at all (I'll be lucky to get two summers out of my ZII's at about $1k per set), so factor that into long term costs as well.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wparsons For This Useful Post:
fatoni (12-18-2013)
Old 12-19-2013, 02:38 AM   #14
OICU812
Just a dude
 
OICU812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Scion FR-S 2013
Location: Edson, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,289
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 1,188 Times in 852 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
And if you choose a high tread life tire over 300 rating like a MPSS you'll be smarter money up front to just something else to consider either way you go.
__________________
OICU812 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wheel Directory: ESM 004 17x9.0 +38 Scott Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 25 06-26-2017 05:54 AM
WTB: 18x9.5/ 18x9/ 17x9/ 17x9.5 Square With or without tires loogs Wheels and Tires 11 12-08-2013 04:40 PM
Should I try a 17x9 +20 square? Drftfan Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 15 07-21-2013 06:40 PM
18x9.5 +45 (square) VS 18x9.5 +35 Front 18x8.5 +40 Rear (staggered) Funky Fresh Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 42 05-07-2013 10:52 AM
17X9 SQUARE OR 18X8.5F AND 18X9.5R DAN_BRZ Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 42 05-03-2013 02:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.