|
||||||
| Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires. |
| View Poll Results: 17x9 -VS- 18x9 | |||
| 17x9 |
|
43 | 66.15% |
| 18x9 |
|
22 | 33.85% |
| Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Emperor JDM
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
17x9 -VS- 18x9 Square
I'm debating between these two sizes for next spring.
17x9 +35 w/ 245/40r17 or 255/40r17 18x9 +35 w/ 245/40r18 or 255/35r18 Both have their pros and cons but which one should I go for and why?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 770
Thanks: 450
Thanked 536 Times in 316 Posts
Mentioned: 137 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I'd say 17s, generally it will weigh less overall, and will be cheaper! But if you don't care about performance much, 18s will probably look a little better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Serial Cone Killer
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: '14 BRZ - WRB Premium 6MT
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,326
Thanks: 1,081
Thanked 656 Times in 441 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The 18's will look nicer, but for me, I'd go with 17's because they weigh less and the thicker sidewalls mean that road imperfections won't be as rough on the ass bones. In the end, go with what your gut tells you, you are probably leaning more towards one or the other. Go with your stomach, it's hungry.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Turkish For This Useful Post: | jkamelo (01-03-2021) |
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Ultramarine FR-S MT
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,941
Thanks: 679
Thanked 1,771 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I compared Enkei RPF1's in 18X9.5 and 17X9 and the weight difference isn't too much, a couple pounds. The size of the wheel though on the other hand creates more rotational mass which might actually make the car work a bit more to get the wheels turning. Not sure how accurate that is, but it seems to be the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: GR86 / Supra MK5 MT / MR-S / Z4
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 836
Thanks: 593
Thanked 725 Times in 342 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'd go for 18", however tires should be 245/35/18 if you want it as near as possible to stock diameter
__________________
My GR86 Car Journal: https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153879 My old GT86 Car Journal: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22222 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Emperor JDM
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Well, I'm all about doing things classy but functional. I'm sort of leaning towards the 17's as they'll be lighter and cheaper to run for the long term. They just don't grab your attention as the 18's do. The 18's look quite a bit nicer but at the expense of weight and the cost of tires can be signifcantly more.
My car is a daily driver that may see a small amount of lapping days per year.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: Some kind of Subaru
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 769
Thanks: 276
Thanked 257 Times in 185 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
1337
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ WRB S/C
Location: San Jose, CA / Waterloo, ON
Posts: 1,134
Thanks: 776
Thanked 482 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I picked 18's because 17's don't look big enough in my eyes for the car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Emperor JDM
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
I'm a meaty tire kinda guy.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If you want pure performance for a time attack type situation, you're better off with 8" wide rims with 225's.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Emperor JDM
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: '91 MR2 Gen3 3SGTE, '13 FRS
Location: Onterrible, Canada
Posts: 1,750
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 909 Times in 495 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The car will be a DD with little track time. Eventually, it will be turned turboed so may as well go for the wheel size that'll accomidate that. Plus, 9" width on all four corners looks business. I'd rather have too much grip than not enough. I guess I can say that the cost of tires is pretty important to me when talking long term. A 17x9 with a 245 would probably be most economical in terms of performance per dollar. But 18"s look more satisfying. That's the delimma I'm having. Aesthetics versus running costs. I may not be satisfied with the look of a 17x9; whereas, 255/35r18's can rack up a tire tab quite quickly. I may have to flip a coin with this one. The votes so far are pretty even too lol.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
^^ Wider != more grip... sticky tires need heat to generate full grip, and going too wide can actually give you less grip because they won't get warm enough. My 17x8's with 225's weigh less than stock, and are WAY stickier, plus a 225 will perform better on an 8" rim than a 7" rim.
IMO, forgetting budget, you should go for the 18's since you seem to be looking more for how they look than ultimate performance on a track. If you want to consider the long term budget, your best bet is to get a set of 17x9's for track tires and then whatever you think looks good for the street with average summer tires. Sticky tires won't last that long at all (I'll be lucky to get two summers out of my ZII's at about $1k per set), so factor that into long term costs as well.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak... flickr |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to wparsons For This Useful Post: | fatoni (12-18-2013) |
|
|
#14 |
|
Just a dude
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Scion FR-S 2013
Location: Edson, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,289
Thanks: 1,185
Thanked 1,188 Times in 852 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
And if you choose a high tread life tire over 300 rating like a MPSS you'll be smarter money up front to just something else to consider either way you go.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wheel Directory: ESM 004 17x9.0 +38 | Scott | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 25 | 06-26-2017 05:54 AM |
| WTB: 18x9.5/ 18x9/ 17x9/ 17x9.5 Square With or without tires | loogs | Wheels and Tires | 11 | 12-08-2013 04:40 PM |
| Should I try a 17x9 +20 square? | Drftfan | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 15 | 07-21-2013 06:40 PM |
| 18x9.5 +45 (square) VS 18x9.5 +35 Front 18x8.5 +40 Rear (staggered) | Funky Fresh | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 42 | 05-07-2013 10:52 AM |
| 17X9 SQUARE OR 18X8.5F AND 18X9.5R | DAN_BRZ | Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 42 | 05-03-2013 02:33 PM |