follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2014, 11:17 PM   #15
Infamous Performance
Senior Member
 
Infamous Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 02 WRX, 05 LGT, 08 LGT, 08 SpecB
Location: Escondido, Ca
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 64
Thanked 209 Times in 125 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Crank pulley is an ok mod. You lose a few pounds off the end of the crank which equates to a few hundred pounds of "load". But, you lose the samll amount of vibration damopening that the stock pulley provides.

The other pulleys are a waste of money.

If you have an MT the crank pulley is less "impressive". If you have a AT you feel it more.

If you have an MT, do not mix a LWCP with a LWFW. By removing the mass and inertia from both sides of the crank you will cause all the vibration to be absorbed in the crank bearings. You will eat right through the bearings fast. We have seen bearing failures in as little as 2000 miles in EJ motors when combining a LWCP and a LWFW.
Infamous Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Infamous Performance For This Useful Post:
#maverick# (08-04-2014), 2much (01-05-2015), Ammunition (09-12-2014), Black Tire (03-23-2015), Cal3000 (11-11-2014), gonzo (08-05-2014), jcw99 (06-18-2016), mwjcyber (08-20-2014), Namuna (09-11-2014), radroach (08-06-2014), sato (08-11-2014)
Old 08-01-2014, 11:22 PM   #16
WallsAndFoundations
Senior Member
 
WallsAndFoundations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives:
Posts: 650
Thanks: 379
Thanked 146 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infamous Performance View Post
Crank pulley is an ok mod. You lose a few pounds off the end of the crank which equates to a few hundred pounds of "load". But, you lose the samll amount of vibration damopening that the stock pulley provides.

The other pulleys are a waste of money.

If you have an MT the crank pulley is less "impressive". If you have a AT you feel it more.

If you have an MT, do not mix a LWCP with a LWFW. By removing the mass and inertia from both sides of the crank you will cause all the vibration to be absorbed in the crank bearings. You will eat right through the bearings fast. We have seen bearing failures in as little as 2000 miles in EJ motors when combining a LWCP and a LWFW.
Super helpful comment. Thank you. So long story short, go for either a reduced weight flywheel or a reduced weight crank shaft but not both cause that = no Bueno.

What's the acceleration feel like with the new pulley?
WallsAndFoundations is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 11:36 PM   #17
Infamous Performance
Senior Member
 
Infamous Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 02 WRX, 05 LGT, 08 LGT, 08 SpecB
Location: Escondido, Ca
Posts: 4,341
Thanks: 64
Thanked 209 Times in 125 Posts
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Exactly, 1 or the other. Both is what goes boom.

On an AT you can feel the slight improvement in acceleration. Throttle response is snappier and the car gets off the line quicker. If you are uber nice to the throttle while cruising you can usually see a 1-2mpg increase as well.

On the MT it is not as noticeable. Same changes, just a smaller dose.
Infamous Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Infamous Performance For This Useful Post:
mwjcyber (08-20-2014), WallsAndFoundations (08-01-2014)
Old 08-01-2014, 11:40 PM   #18
WallsAndFoundations
Senior Member
 
WallsAndFoundations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives:
Posts: 650
Thanks: 379
Thanked 146 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infamous Performance View Post
Exactly, 1 or the other. Both is what goes boom.

On an AT you can feel the slight improvement in acceleration. Throttle response is snappier and the car gets off the line quicker. If you are uber nice to the throttle while cruising you can usually see a 1-2mpg increase as well.

On the MT it is not as noticeable. Same changes, just a smaller dose.
Gotcha. So me owning a manual I'll still feel a difference. . Just not as much as an auto.

In your opinion - as it seems you know your shit - is it worth it? Only 300 bucks or so and it seems to add a decent amount of performance.. and a possible MPG boost you say?
WallsAndFoundations is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 12:09 AM   #19
Akari
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2013 DGM BRZ
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 417
Thanks: 181
Thanked 149 Times in 97 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infamous Performance View Post
If you have an MT the crank pulley is less "impressive". If you have a AT you feel it more.
Can you explain why this would be? 4lbs off the crank pulley saves you the same amount of rotational mass on both a MT and AT. From a physics standpoint the power gain from it has to be identical, why do you say this is felt more in a AT?

Also 1-2mpg seems like quite the overstatement. 4lbs less of rotational mass at the crank typically equates to more like a .1-.2mpg at most in my experience. Do you have any evidence to back this up?
Akari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 12:17 AM   #20
Turdinator
Señor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 769 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by WallsAndFoundations View Post
Gotcha. So me owning a manual I'll still feel a difference. . Just not as much as an auto.

In your opinion - as it seems you know your shit - is it worth it? Only 300 bucks or so and it seems to add a decent amount of performance.. and a possible MPG boost you say?
You'll feel a light weight flywheel more tho. I am pretty sure they can be had for not much more than the $300 you mentioned.
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 12:20 AM   #21
WallsAndFoundations
Senior Member
 
WallsAndFoundations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives:
Posts: 650
Thanks: 379
Thanked 146 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turdinator View Post
You'll feel a light weight flywheel more tho. I am pretty sure they can be had for not much more than the $300 you mentioned.
Feel install would be a lot more expensive for install though.... but in the end it's really what is better for the car. If I go that route what manufacturers should I look at??
WallsAndFoundations is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 12:54 AM   #22
Turdinator
Señor Member
 
Turdinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 769 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by WallsAndFoundations View Post
Feel install would be a lot more expensive for install though.... but in the end it's really what is better for the car. If I go that route what manufacturers should I look at??
Brand is down to personal preference. I personally like Toda as they work with the standard clutch and are chromoly steel. I haven't installed mine yet as I still need to track down some ARP bolts.
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT
Turdinator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Turdinator For This Useful Post:
s30series (11-10-2014)
Old 08-02-2014, 12:55 AM   #23
WallsAndFoundations
Senior Member
 
WallsAndFoundations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives:
Posts: 650
Thanks: 379
Thanked 146 Times in 117 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turdinator View Post
Brand is down to personal preference. I personally like Toda as they work with the standard clutch and are chromoly steel. I haven't installed mine yet as I still need to track down some ARP bolts.
Thanks Turdinator. I was gonna do it this month but obviously I got some stuff to think about.
WallsAndFoundations is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WallsAndFoundations For This Useful Post:
Turdinator (08-02-2014)
Old 08-02-2014, 02:29 AM   #24
Brinks
Senior Member
 
Brinks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Lodi, CA
Posts: 172
Thanks: 74
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infamous Performance View Post
The other pulleys are a waste of money.

Seems like the other pulleys would be just as important. Don't they all share the same load? less weight less resistance......

Last edited by Brinks; 08-02-2014 at 09:05 AM.
Brinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 10:05 AM   #25
Malt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2015 WRX
Location: NC
Posts: 987
Thanks: 186
Thanked 624 Times in 364 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinks View Post
Seems like the other pulleys would be just as important. Don't they all share the same load? less weight less resistance......
I imagine his statement refers to the cost vs gains ratio of the other pullys. You lose roughly 4 pounds with the crank pulley at a cost of $145. To add the water pump and alternator pulley raises the cost by an additional $230 but you only lose roughly 0.5 pound. After that, replacing the idlers gets you roughly 0.3 pounds weight loss for another $120 when purchased in the S2 set or $225 when purchased alone.

Out of all of the pulleys available from raceseng the highest value comes in buying the crank pulley by itself or the complete S2 setup. The higher quality bearings in them are especially important if you are going to supercharge as people have had issues with pulleys melting/bearings giving out.

Looking solely at a cost/benefit ratio in this case is pretty misleading as those people are seeing an additional cost of $350 for all the other pulleys and only dropping the weight by ~0.9 lbs as opposed to the 4 lb reduction with only the crank pulley that only costs $145. They are not accounting for the better bearings that are in the idlers and the fact that they are no longer plastic.

Also as with everything else in modding cars, there are diminishing returns everywhere, especially on this platform while staying NA. The S2 kit might not meet everyone's needs, but those who want to squeak out every bit of performance they can understand that the lowest hanging fruit is always the first picked and everything else requires more effort/money.

I'm not going with a pulley kit just yet, but when I do it will most assuredly be a raceseng S2 set in black.

As for Infamous Performance claims of issues with pulleys and lightened flywheels, I have yet to see anyone talk of problems with the FA20 motor. Infact I'm fairly certain there are several people running full raceseng S2 set, lightened flywheels, and carbon driveshafts with no problems. Sure there might have been issues with the EJ's (uggh, hello 02-03 WRX) but this is a completely new motor and I'm failing to see how the two are related.
Malt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Malt For This Useful Post:
Brinks (08-02-2014), Clipdat (08-04-2014), himbo (08-08-2014)
Old 08-02-2014, 02:35 PM   #26
Brinks
Senior Member
 
Brinks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Lodi, CA
Posts: 172
Thanks: 74
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malt View Post
I imagine his statement refers to the cost vs gains ratio of the other pullys. You lose roughly 4 pounds with the crank pulley at a cost of $145. To add the water pump and alternator pulley raises the cost by an additional $230 but you only lose roughly 0.5 pound. After that, replacing the idlers gets you roughly 0.3 pounds weight loss for another $120 when purchased in the S2 set or $225 when purchased alone.

Out of all of the pulleys available from raceseng the highest value comes in buying the crank pulley by itself or the complete S2 setup. The higher quality bearings in them are especially important if you are going to supercharge as people have had issues with pulleys melting/bearings giving out.

Looking solely at a cost/benefit ratio in this case is pretty misleading as those people are seeing an additional cost of $350 for all the other pulleys and only dropping the weight by ~0.9 lbs as opposed to the 4 lb reduction with only the crank pulley that only costs $145. They are not accounting for the better bearings that are in the idlers and the fact that they are no longer plastic.

Also as with everything else in modding cars, there are diminishing returns everywhere, especially on this platform while staying NA. The S2 kit might not meet everyone's needs, but those who want to squeak out every bit of performance they can understand that the lowest hanging fruit is always the first picked and everything else requires more effort/money.

I'm not going with a pulley kit just yet, but when I do it will most assuredly be a raceseng S2 set in black.

As for Infamous Performance claims of issues with pulleys and lightened flywheels, I have yet to see anyone talk of problems with the FA20 motor. Infact I'm fairly certain there are several people running full raceseng S2 set, lightened flywheels, and carbon driveshafts with no problems. Sure there might have been issues with the EJ's (uggh, hello 02-03 WRX) but this is a completely new motor and I'm failing to see how the two are related.
Every little bit counts when your staying NA. I'm surprised the rest of the pulley kit only saves 1lb. I'll be going with the complete S2 setup too once they fix the water pulley issue and a ***riveshaft/RPF1's a little later down the road.

Personally lightweight flywheels are about the worst thing you can do to a daily driver. It makes stop and go traffic a nightmare not to mention having every minivan smoke you off the line while your revving the shit out of your car like a jack ass so you don't bog down. Awesome for the track not so awesome on the street.
Brinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2014, 03:07 PM   #27
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,671
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 4,006 Times in 2,095 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Going to a 10 lb. aluminum flywheel (13 lb. lighter than stock) on the Z was a GREAT mod. Easier/quicker shifting up and down the gears, and slightly QUICKER off the line, not slower. IMO a lightweight flywheel is a MUCH better and more effective mod than replacing the factory harmonic damper with a slightly lighter-weight solid pulley which will increase dynamic stresses in the crank and give about zero discernible performance benefit.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
Boxer486 (08-03-2014), litemup (08-03-2014), sato (08-11-2014), stugray (08-02-2014), Turdinator (08-03-2014)
Old 08-02-2014, 03:23 PM   #28
Brinks
Senior Member
 
Brinks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: BRZ
Location: Lodi, CA
Posts: 172
Thanks: 74
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Going to a 10 lb. aluminum flywheel (13 lb. lighter than stock) on the Z was a GREAT mod. Easier/quicker shifting up and down the gears, and slightly QUICKER off the line, not slower. IMO a lightweight flywheel is a MUCH better and more effective mod than replacing the factory harmonic damper with a slightly lighter-weight solid pulley which will increase dynamic stresses in the crank and give about zero discernible performance benefit.
I've had two lightweight flywheels, one on a 05 20G STi another on a BT Gt28rs Audi A4. Both were terrible. Maybe it was due to the specific set up but they were a buzz kill.

Theirs no harmonic dampener on a flat 4. "Zero performance benefits" is also a bold statement for 5lb's off the rotational mass that a pulley kit will get you. Sure it doesn't show up on a dyno but the car will accelerate faster using the same amount of power. My 510 only has a 110 HP and it smokes my BRZ off the line. Numbers arnt everything.
Brinks is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Light weight flywheel and crank pulley? wootwoot Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 133 06-23-2015 02:04 PM
Light Weight Pulley's exam2300 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 18 02-08-2014 01:02 AM
FS:PERRIN Light weight pulley NEW $85 Shipped Amalgamo Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 1 05-01-2013 12:10 PM
FS - Agency Power Light Weight Pulley Kochinopride Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 3 11-12-2012 06:32 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.