follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-19-2013, 05:26 AM   #1
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Drift-Office : Vortech SC with and without Header - Case Study / Discussion?

FYI, this post was made in response to requests to quantify / justify the purchase of a $1100 header when employed with a SC / FI solution. Feel free to discuss!

Vortech Build :
Ref : http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43053

HKS Equal Length Header Results :
Ref : http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41525

Vortech Build with HKS Equal Length Header :
Ref : http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45835

So the general consensus is that an FI product such as the Vortech (or any other SC unit) would yield better results when used in conjunction with other bolt ons such as a header. We recently had a chance to tune the Vortech SC setup on two different cars and the results were well, surprising.

Name:  Vortech SC & HKS EL 1.jpg
Views: 4332
Size:  131.3 KB

^^^ Granted that we are talking about two different cars, but both are identically setup post header: Perrin overpipe, front pipe and 2.5 inch exhausts.

Name:  Vortech SC & HKS EL 2.jpg
Views: 3937
Size:  142.2 KB

^^^ As one can see, there were gains to be had - the mid range is even flatter now and the top end revs out much more efficiently as well.

Name:  Vortech SC & HKS EL 3.jpg
Views: 3908
Size:  143.5 KB

So the HKS EL header did it's thing, and while there were gains to be had, I felt that the price to performance ratio wasn't where it should have been. Both cars were running Chevron 92 Octane with 10 PSI pulleys and both cars had cam timing tuned for optimal results. The implications would lead you to believe that after a certain point, there's only so much the FA20 can dish out...


Regards!


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Drift-Office For This Useful Post:
autobrz (09-19-2013), BigFatFlip (11-19-2015), botbs (11-21-2020), DAEMANO (09-19-2013), evo4g63 (09-26-2013), mwjcyber (09-19-2014), phloozy (09-27-2013), Sonolin (09-19-2013)
Old 09-19-2013, 08:42 AM   #2
dabocx
Senior Member
 
dabocx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Scion FRS
Location: United States
Posts: 1,267
Thanks: 564
Thanked 261 Times in 191 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Not the best for the price but its a still a nice upgrade for those that have the kit. I wonder if that intake a vendor made will help more or if theres a limit you can do with the 10psi pulley.
dabocx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 08:48 AM   #3
xjohnx
Grip>Slip
 
xjohnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 13 SWP BRZ Ltd - Innovate Powered!
Location: RVA
Posts: 3,563
Thanks: 656
Thanked 1,717 Times in 1,031 Posts
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drift-Office View Post
Both cars were running Chevron 92 Octane with 10 PSI pulleys and both cars had cam timing tuned for optimal results.
I seem to recall some tuners ( maybe it was @moto-mike or @DeliciousTuning ) stating that a header will allow the tuner to make some more cam timing changes that didn't quite work as well with the stock header (Especially on the exhaust cams). Was this your experience as well?

This one may be wishful thinking, but is there any chance the car owners would be willing to swap headers for a few dyno runs in the name of science? Then we'd have 2 sets of dynos from 2 different cars both on stock and aftermarket headers.
xjohnx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 09:06 AM   #4
bfrank1972
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,041 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
This actually makes sense to me - on most of the dynos I've seen, the header really improves the torque dip much more than anything else. The investment in a header (1100 is one expensive header!) without if was very much to remedy the nasty torque hole the fa20 has - while fi inherently does the same thing. The combination provides an even better midrange, but for those seeking a "good enough" power band, or those on a budget, may well want to invest their funds elsewhere. All depends on who you are, and your goals, but for me I'd probably invest the 1100 in a flex fuel setup instead of headers at this point. Ymmv
bfrank1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 05:50 PM   #5
welllam
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: STi
Location: Hang Zhou
Posts: 62
Thanks: 9
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Given we have that extra grand, instead of header, what should be done in term of better gain value?

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4
welllam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 08:39 PM   #6
R2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: FR-S
Location: Sask., Canada
Posts: 250
Thanks: 84
Thanked 89 Times in 55 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I'm curious about the torque differences at 2000rpm - is this just from applying full throttle at different rpm's for the two cars on the dyno or is the output of the stock headered car that much more around there?
R2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2013, 08:41 PM   #7
Sonolin
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: SoCal
Posts: 885
Thanks: 1,489
Thanked 289 Times in 176 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Hurry up, Nameless Performance! I want to see that header on a Vortech

Looks like good consistent gains from the HKS btw.
Sonolin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 12:59 AM   #8
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
This is excelent! Tests like these are very informative. Lets see some more headers!
__________________
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sw20kosh For This Useful Post:
calispec (09-25-2013), Drift-Office (09-20-2013)
Old 09-22-2013, 02:48 PM   #9
Cal3000
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Panda FR-S
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 531
Thanks: 297
Thanked 377 Times in 161 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by welllam View Post
Given we have that extra grand, instead of header, what should be done in term of better gain value?

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4
Injectors, fuel pump, and a dyno tune can probably give you better gains and will get rid of that hp dip after 6.5k rpm.
Injectors $300-$400
Fuel pump $130
Tune depends on the tuner.
If EL headers are added to this combo, I'm pretty sure you can hit or almost hit 300whp on 9psi pulley with pumped gas.

Guys at Evasive down here in SoCal got a bone stock Vortech on 91 oct to 250whp on a mustang dyno with just a fuel pump and injectors.
__________________
Vortech SC on 9psi Pulley, Invidia Catless Front Pipe, Invidia N1 Catback Exhaust
242whp/197ft-lb on Mustang Dyno (91 octane water)
284whp/223ft-lb on Mustang Dyno (E85)
Delicious Tuning
Cal3000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2013, 05:51 AM   #10
welllam
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: STi
Location: Hang Zhou
Posts: 62
Thanks: 9
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal3000 View Post
Injectors, fuel pump, and a dyno tune can probably give you better gains and will get rid of that hp dip after 6.5k rpm.
Injectors $300-$400
Fuel pump $130
Tune depends on the tuner.
If EL headers are added to this combo, I'm pretty sure you can hit or almost hit 300whp on 9psi pulley with pumped gas.

Guys at Evasive down here in SoCal got a bone stock Vortech on 91 oct to 250whp on a mustang dyno with just a fuel pump and injectors.
I heard mixed feedback with stock injectors and pump, some said its useful, same said no useful with stock piston and pumpgas.

Are these cars cat-less?
welllam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 06:42 PM   #11
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal3000 View Post
Injectors, fuel pump, and a dyno tune can probably give you better gains and will get rid of that hp dip after 6.5k rpm. If EL headers are added to this combo, I'm pretty sure you can hit or almost hit 300whp on 9psi pulley with pumped gas.
That's a lot of assumption about what's going on after 6500 rpm. Plus, I doubt you'll hit 300WHP with pump gas, 93 octane or not. Certainly not with the Vortech SC and any EL header of that combination.

Well maybe, perhaps if it revved out past 10000 RPM...

Quote:
Originally Posted by xjohnx View Post
I seem to recall some tuners stating that a header will allow the tuner to make some more cam timing changes that didn't quite work as well with the stock header (Especially on the exhaust cams). Was this your experience as well?
For the NA setups, ABSOLUTELY. What we're finding that in a FI SC setups like this, it didn't matter as much, oddly enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xjohnx View Post
This one may be wishful thinking, but is there any chance the car owners would be willing to swap headers for a few dyno runs in the name of science? Then we'd have 2 sets of dynos from 2 different cars both on stock and aftermarket headers.
I'll do one better - I just had another FRS come in with a Borla UEL and will be swapping out for the HKS (latter is sold out till 10/22) and when that comes in, it would be a direct 1:1 comparison at that point. Stay tuned, as always!

Quote:
Originally Posted by welllam View Post
I heard mixed feedback with stock injectors and pump, some said its useful, same said no useful with stock piston and pumpgas.

Are these cars cat-less?
It really comes down to the fuel used, as the FA20 is very octane sensitive. And both cars had a Perrin 2.5 inch Catted Front Pipe too.

Regards,


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drift-Office For This Useful Post:
evo4g63 (09-26-2013), mwjcyber (09-19-2014)
Old 09-26-2013, 08:57 PM   #12
empower-auto
Kouki-Monster
 
empower-auto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 1,137
Thanks: 11
Thanked 562 Times in 261 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Didn't someone else make better gains with a different header? This probably isn't a good judge of the ultimate yes or no on a header being worth it with this kit. Expensive header + not overly impressive result = test different headers perhaps?
__________________
Rich Anderson
EMPOWER AUTO
empower-auto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2013, 12:23 AM   #13
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by empower-auto View Post
Didn't someone else make better gains with a different header? This probably isn't a good judge of the ultimate yes or no on a header being worth it with this kit. Expensive header + not overly impressive result = test different headers perhaps?
Not sure who you might be thinking but the HKS ELs have proven to yield the most consistent gains (>190WHP NA) with 92 Octane from all the headers tested at this facility - so it would be a natural assumption that the header with the most ability when used on a Vortech or Innovate SC unit would yield the most gains.

Clearly not so the case.

I'm not sure how many more Vortech SC kits have gotten 270 with 92 Octane, and most we were seeing was 255 - 265 without the header, again, in line with the octane used. There was one 'guy' that made more power with a UEL and a "pump gas" tune using E85, but that car has since burnt to the ground unfortunately, and henceforth has been exempted from the current pool of candidates.

Cheers,


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2013, 08:05 AM   #14
rskdsk
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: series 10 FR-S (2361)
Location: Cape Coral, FL
Posts: 88
Thanks: 1
Thanked 57 Times in 18 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
"It really comes down to the fuel used, as the FA20 is very octane sensitive. And both cars had a Perrin 2.5 inch Catted Front Pipe too."


VERY sensitive! I found this out first hand.
rskdsk is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drift-Office : HKS EL Header Tuned! Drift-Office Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 84 05-05-2014 01:34 AM
Drift-Office : Borla UEL Header... TUNED. Drift-Office Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 41 10-26-2013 12:54 PM
Drift-Office : Vortech / HKS EL / Perrin / Greddy Installed & Tuned! Drift-Office Forced Induction 8 09-03-2013 07:20 PM
Drift-Office : Vortech / Perrin Combo Installed & Tuned! Drift-Office Forced Induction 44 08-06-2013 07:37 PM
Drift-Office N/A tune zuldajin Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 14 07-09-2013 09:38 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.