|
||||||
| Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '87 Corolla GTS, '13 FR-S 6MT
Location: United States
Posts: 364
Thanks: 54
Thanked 146 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Anyone running 3" exhaust & catless header?
Hello all,
I was thinking of going to a full 3" exhaust with a cat-less header and catted front pipe. Anyone running a set up like this? If so, what kind of layout are you running in terms of mufflers and resonators? What kind of sound levels are you getting? Please comment on your setup and post vids! Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
CAMBAM
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FRS
Location: San Diego
Posts: 600
Thanks: 307
Thanked 250 Times in 158 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Are you planning on forced induction??? 3" is a little much N/A Im at 2 and 1/4
__________________
If you think the FRS/BRZ isn't fast enough, the roads you're driving on are too straight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
is better than you
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 2013 raven FRS
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,293
Thanks: 591
Thanked 1,347 Times in 745 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
yup make sure you're not losing any back pressure with the 3inch either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '87 Corolla GTS, '13 FR-S 6MT
Location: United States
Posts: 364
Thanks: 54
Thanked 146 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I'm not a fan of most 2.5" systems since most use the factory donut gasket for the cat-back which still pinches down to 2.25". The only true 2.5" exhaust that I'm aware of is the Perrin that uses a chamber style muffler, which I'm also not a fan of. I'm not sure I want any back pressure, maybe you're talking about harmonics for the scavenging effect? |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to RiskyTrousers For This Useful Post: | TouchMyHonda (07-26-2013) |
|
|
#5 | |
|
is better than you
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 2013 raven FRS
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,293
Thanks: 591
Thanked 1,347 Times in 745 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: UltraMarine FRS MT
Location: SoCal
Posts: 198
Thanks: 43
Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Cyau For This Useful Post: | Marchy (07-26-2013) |
|
|
#7 |
|
Doctor
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Fast
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 496
Thanks: 410
Thanked 203 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Some back pressure for a FI car is good too! My Grand Prix was supercharged and when I ran open headers I lost a lot of back pressure and lost a lot of launching power ( which was good, I would spin off the line like crazy) but I had more top end power. I would stick with the 2.5 like everyone. Gotta figure I am sure GReddy and other billion dollar exhaust companies know better than you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Vtec Jesus
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 13 Golf R, 15 Audi S4
Location: LSD
Posts: 1,165
Thanks: 623
Thanked 243 Times in 153 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
this engine will make far more power on a 3 inch vs. 2.5 inch all day. try it before you knock it. remember... this engine is at 12.5 compression.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '87 Corolla GTS, '13 FR-S 6MT
Location: United States
Posts: 364
Thanks: 54
Thanked 146 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Although this is turning into a great discussion about exhaust system design principles, lets get back on topic and hear from people running this set-up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
CAMBAM
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FRS
Location: San Diego
Posts: 600
Thanks: 307
Thanked 250 Times in 158 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
well sir 1.) show me proof and 2.) why arent all the top companies making there exhaust systems that wide then if its supposedly better???
__________________
If you think the FRS/BRZ isn't fast enough, the roads you're driving on are too straight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: '87 Corolla GTS, '13 FR-S 6MT
Location: United States
Posts: 364
Thanks: 54
Thanked 146 Times in 67 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
CAMBAM
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FRS
Location: San Diego
Posts: 600
Thanks: 307
Thanked 250 Times in 158 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Found this on a high performance shop website specifically talking about the FRS/BRZ
I will mainly leave my car stock or add slight modifications. What exhaust do you recommend? If you are going to mainly have a stock car with the exception of an intake and various other modifications, you can simply get a new axleback or catback exhaust that is around the stock size or a bit bigger. We don't recommend to go with too big of an exhaust as you won't gain much power but you will certainly create a lot of noise. At these kind of modification levels, a nice 2.5" exhaust would be just right. I want to get a full exhaust, all the bolt ons, and maybe later nitrous or a supercharger If you know you are going to try and make more power with all of the bolt on modifications plus a power adder such as nitrous or a supercharger (note we're not grouping turbo kits into this), then we would recommend at least a 2.5" exhaust or more, maybe even a 2.75" exhaust. We also recommend an exhaust that has a straight through muffler for less restriction. A straight through muffler will be louder, but also allow you to make more power as the muffler isn't as restrictive and allows for easier exhaust flow. I need power! I am going to go turbo for sure, and need to make as much power as possible For the all out exhaust, we recommend a 3" exhaust with a straight through muffler as well as the rest of the exhaust also being upgraded with 3" from the turbo back. If you are going to run less than 10 PSI, you can still run a 2.5" or 2.75" exhaust, but you will limit your power potential. For those with a built motor, 3" is the way to go.
__________________
If you think the FRS/BRZ isn't fast enough, the roads you're driving on are too straight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
WUB WUB
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 Firestorm
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 2,788
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,573 Times in 858 Posts
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I have a 3" header back exhaust and catless UEL header. I seemed to have more power than others were making (after tune) with the 2.5.
and that's exactly the setup I had, OP, that with an Injen intake, was making 200whp NA.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S in Ultramarine
Location: Round Mountain
Posts: 85
Thanks: 171
Thanked 26 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I personally wouldn't go 3 on a NA motor. My Mustang has 2.75 and it is a lot more responsive than when it had 3's. I'm not planning to race my FR-S at the moment, but I think I'd be more than happy with a 2.5 exhaust and supporting mods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Borla UEL Header, Full Catless exhaust, Stock Midpipe, Berk Muffler Delete | evilconcarne999 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 34 | 03-24-2014 02:39 PM |
| Anyone only running a catless front pipe?? | Pele86 | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 7 | 08-01-2013 03:35 PM |
| Advice on running catless | Raike | NY / NJ / CT / PA | 5 | 06-04-2013 04:29 PM |
| SRT header back exhaust catless w/ tip A | serial gixxer | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 6 | 12-05-2012 12:00 AM |