View Single Post
Old 10-14-2019, 01:42 PM   #22
Irace86.2.0
Senior Member
 
Irace86.2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrg666 View Post
X hp using Ace and X hp with another header are not the same strain on the engine since Ace makes the difference through efficiency, better flow. If it was legal installing a catless header in NY, I would have installed the ACE header for sure and get some more power with increased engine reliability. Based on this data, it seems like there is 30hp extra untapped waiting, which is without increasing the boost and increasing the failure risk. Thank you, @CSG Mike!
If it is more torque via more area under the curve, but without more peak torque then I would agree, but it is not. Even then, low end torque can be worse on this platform. It doesn’t matter if the Ace does it with less heat and less restrictions, torque is what breaks rods. There might be less chances of preignition/detonation with the Ace header, but torque is torque.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Irace86.2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post:
NoHaveMSG (10-14-2019)