View Single Post
Old 07-16-2019, 12:44 PM   #21
Racecomp Engineering
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2016 BRZ, 2012 Paris Di2 & 2018 STI
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 5,403
Thanks: 3,416
Thanked 7,241 Times in 2,962 Posts
Mentioned: 303 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to Racecomp Engineering
Quote:
Originally Posted by x_hawker View Post
Noted. Whiteline bushings are also at the top of my list, and I have 102k miles on my current shocks, but they don't feel like they're out yet (I probably can't even tell between worn and not unworn).

Hope I'm not asking too much, but is there an explanation as to why a lower spring rate would be geared towards oversteer, and vice versa, why a higher spring rate would induce more grip? Or is that just a fallacy?
Higher overall spring rates means faster response and less roll so less geometry/alignment change.

Lower overall spring rates mean more compliance.

Softening spring rates at one end of the car means less weight transfer at that end of the car, meaning more evenly loaded tires, meaning more grip at that end of the car. So softer up front means more grip up front and thus more oversteer. BUT the other consequences (more goemetry change, potential bottoming, etc) may negatively impact grip, along with reduced response.

That's the short version.

- Andrew
Racecomp Engineering is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post:
steel86gt (07-17-2019), x_hawker (07-17-2019)