View Single Post
Old 10-27-2012, 02:58 AM   #5
einzlr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: several
Location: norcal
Posts: 903
Thanks: 421
Thanked 286 Times in 223 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Shadow View Post
Almost 40? Wow, that's not bad at all. I didn't consider that the rating might be lower than real-life figures.
@rikdrt1 is right, very few cars get better than rated fuel economy - hence the infamous disclaimer "your mileage may vary" I get about 10mph above EPA in the Accent, but the BMWs are guzzlers. I'd guess that in the case of the twins it's due to how the tests are set up; probably they end up revving the engine more than people are actually doing in daily driving or something like that. Maybe someone who knows more about how EPA ratings are derived can chime in.
__________________
Asphalt FR-S MT (future)
'05 Hyundai Accent; '01 BMW M Coupe; '01 BMW M Roadster (for sale); '99 BMW Z3 Coupe 2.8l (for sale)

"Simplicate and add lightness." - Gordon Hooton
einzlr is offline   Reply With Quote