Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB - View Single Post - OFT

solidONE · 05-11-2016, 08:03 PM

To test the changes I made to some of the fine correction tables I went ahead and changed my original "Z6" tune to start at .5 IAM with no other changes (left side of the image above), reflashed then took a log to see how quickly IAM builds up to 1. Then I flashed basically the same tune with the changes to the 3 tables I did in an earlier post. I'll call it "Z6 KC1" test tune.

Z6 test tune log: http://datazap.me/u/solidone/z6-iam-...1&zoom=30-1107

Z6 KC1 test log: http://datazap.me/u/solidone/z6-iam-...&zoom=405-1273

I'm not sure if you can tell by looking at the log, but the changes I made work as expected. While the Z6 tune did not take very long to recover IAM back to 1 the Z6 KC1 tune did so quicker.

Another thing I've observed is that the FLKC never went above +1 in either of the logs. As the IAM increased the +FLKC values became progressively lower. I'm not quite sure whether changing the Fine Correction Stored Value Limit from 3.5 to 4 contributed to a faster rate of recovery. @Kodename47 I think maybe you have a better idea of what this particular table is doing than I do. Though, from the looks of it, I think increasing this value is pretty irrelevant to what I'm trying to accomplish, yes?

For shits 'n giggles, another run at the .5 mile road. FLKC still flatline.

http://datazap.me/u/solidone/z6-iam-...zoom=1502-2261

05-11-2016, 08:03 PM	#175
solidONE Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Drives: FR-S Whiteout Location: California Posts: 2,863 Thanks: 1,808 Thanked 790 Times in 611 Posts Mentioned: 42 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	To test the changes I made to some of the fine correction tables I went ahead and changed my original "Z6" tune to start at .5 IAM with no other changes (left side of the image above), reflashed then took a log to see how quickly IAM builds up to 1. Then I flashed basically the same tune with the changes to the 3 tables I did in an earlier post. I'll call it "Z6 KC1" test tune. Z6 test tune log: http://datazap.me/u/solidone/z6-iam-...1&zoom=30-1107 Z6 KC1 test log: http://datazap.me/u/solidone/z6-iam-...&zoom=405-1273 I'm not sure if you can tell by looking at the log, but the changes I made work as expected. While the Z6 tune did not take very long to recover IAM back to 1 the Z6 KC1 tune did so quicker. Another thing I've observed is that the FLKC never went above +1 in either of the logs. As the IAM increased the +FLKC values became progressively lower. I'm not quite sure whether changing the Fine Correction Stored Value Limit from 3.5 to 4 contributed to a faster rate of recovery. @Kodename47 I think maybe you have a better idea of what this particular table is doing than I do. Though, from the looks of it, I think increasing this value is pretty irrelevant to what I'm trying to accomplish, yes? For shits 'n giggles, another run at the .5 mile road. FLKC still flatline. http://datazap.me/u/solidone/z6-iam-...zoom=1502-2261 __________________ Intent > Content cowardice is the mother of cruelty.