View Single Post
Old 10-24-2012, 05:58 PM   #7
Drift-Office
Senior Member
 
Drift-Office's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: AE86 / FRS / FC3S / GC8 / S14 / R32
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 789
Thanks: 633
Thanked 1,431 Times in 372 Posts
Mentioned: 169 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuddbutter View Post
You should and Dyno Dynamics which is pretty much the standard here in Aust.
I love em! I'll be picking up one of those soon enough!

Quote:
Originally Posted by phenom86 View Post
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=166662296807912

Main reason why i like Dynapack better, ive seen this happen many times..
Not that it matters to our cars but there are HP and TQ limitations to the DynaPacks, plus they read at the hubs, not at the wheels...

Ref : http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-09...n/viewall.html

Take it for what it's worth but it should be noted that the MUSTANG dyno baseline run that was used was pre-loaded for whatever reason while the rest of them were inertia based.

I've done my own comparative studies between the Mustangs and Dynojet, both with Cobb Sugeline's new AWD dyno as well as an 18 year old Mustang and found a difference of 2-3% personally, a far cry from some of the myths that are out there...

As always, my 2 cents...


Bob @ Drift-Office, LLC
Drift-Office is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drift-Office For This Useful Post:
phenom86 (10-24-2012)