View Single Post
Old 12-14-2018, 09:52 AM   #34
Joesurf79
Senior Member
 
Joesurf79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2016 White Pearl BRZ Premium
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 548
Thanks: 204
Thanked 251 Times in 147 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by charged86 View Post
im talking about how weak the internals are with boost. as well as the cooling issues when taking it to the track


Every engineered object in your daily life is a compromise and the result of a number of different teams trying to hit multiple (sometimes conflicting) targets. The 86 is no different.


Did it hit it's design objective to live it's life NA in 95% of street use cases? Yep. Having the engine survive making 25% more power regularly was not an objective, thus you see the failures when you ask a system to do things it wasn't designed to from the get go. There just isn't the strtength margin in the design to do it. That's not a wrong choice of powerplant for the car, it just wasn't a design goal.


What was a design goal is the fantastic chassis balance and steering feedback. They hit that target for sure. I just want a smidge more power and a bit less weight. If that comes from the K24 swap with similar reliability, I'm interested.
Joesurf79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Joesurf79 For This Useful Post:
alphasaur (12-14-2018), Irace86.2.0 (12-14-2018), Spuds (01-01-2019)