Quote:
Originally Posted by Dake
It's a fair critique. If the sole reason for the car being .4" lower is because the shark fin moved or is shorter, then that would be genuinely silly (but not especially surprising) marketing speak.
The OP is not saying that's where they found the .4", just that it's a possibility.
Honestly, even I'm not quite that cynical though. I don't think height is measured that way. I don't think they included the original rubber antenna in the 1st gen's official height measurement either.
That being said, that might be noticeable in one big way - I'm already brushing the ceiling in my helmet. Hopefully the half inch isn't lost inside the cabin.
|
Around the time of Subaru’s global reveal event a few publications claimed more headroom compared to the old one, despite the lower height.