Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan
Comparison shots are not comparable, different focal lengths. Most pics I've seen, 2nd gen looks lower to me and same width. Published specs show it 0.4" lower at 51.6" vs. 52.0" and same width as gen1 at 69.9".
|
I don’t think it’s anything in the physical dimensions. Either camera lens/angles or, now that I’m looking at the pictures again, the styling details. The 1st gen headlights and the shape of the front fender arches gives the front end a wider/lower look. Same with the rear where the 2nd gen tail lights, rear fender cutouts and trunk shape give it a narrower look.
The real test will be what they look like out in the real world though.