Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitopo
Hahaha ... are you serious? No one will stop debating. At least not the known ones over here. They'll start questioning about the accuracy of the dyno, the number of the pulls, the way the car was strapped down, the weather or temperature conditions and whatever else you can imagine. It has been done numerous times and not only about pulleys.
I remember similar debates when the same people were questioning about different air intake systems. They were insisting that there were zero gains even after real dyno evidence. Of course, no one from these people would accept the more obvious thing that a different air intake could provide REAL gains just because it was manipulating the MAF readings and you could have a leaner AFR. It is what it is with stubborn people. They'll never change ...
|
serious.
but that would imply that the dyno would show that your car really puts down 198hp at the wheels.
but since that won t be the case...
people will just tell you "we told you"
about the intake thing it s a bit out of topic here, and anyway it s pretty obvious as you said that the gains are because of a leaner afr since you are talking of an aftermarket intake with NOT scaled maf
if you like to go around with a untuned car with random afr just to gain few hp is your choice, once you scale well the mar for that intake you would realize that actually the gains are gone and the difference from the stock intake are so small that it s just wasted money for a NA setup. So well..people were right against you also in that case
