View Single Post
Old 11-18-2016, 04:28 PM   #28
Captain Snooze
Because compromise ®
 
Captain Snooze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,723
Thanks: 3,993
Thanked 9,346 Times in 4,127 Posts
Mentioned: 60 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by x808drifter View Post
His point is why shorten the runners with a new intake manifold just to lengthen it again with the blocks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by churchx View Post
Hmm? JUN's intake manifold with shorter runners for optimisation for higher rpms AND BPB that makes longer runners to move optimisation at lower rpms.
WHY?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
To keep the power band where he needs it. There are obviously other advantages to the manifold besides the shorter runners, as evident bu the dyno plat.
No, I am totally lost.
Photo shows a positive gain in the power curve. Win.
BUT as @x808drifter and @churchx says, and the part that messes with my head, I would have thought that the net length of the runners is about the same. Short JUN runner plus blocks equals same length. I am not disputing the graph, I just don't understand how the result has been achieved.
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.

Captain Snooze is offline   Reply With Quote