Quote:
Originally Posted by FirestormFRS
The Act makes it easier for purchasers to sue for breach of warranty by making breach of warranty a violation of federal law, and by allowing consumers to recover court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. This means that if you lose a lawsuit for breach of either a written or an implied warranty, you may have to pay the customer's costs for bringing the suit, including lawyer's fees.
|
I was referring to the earlier mention of the Magnussen-Moss Act that keeps getting brought up, this Act refers to the use of aftermarket replacement parts and their effect on warranty coverage, none of which applies to this case from what I've read since no one is denying warranty due to a replacement part.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirestormFRS
Quoted from FTC.gov. Refusing to replace the engine if it is found to be a manufacturing defect would constitute a breach of written warranty.....
|
Correct, assuming it's a manufacturing defect. If this were the case, I doubt Subaru wouldn't waste the time fighting it.
__________________
2020 GMC Canyon Denali Duramax, 2021 Forester Sport, 2000 Subaru Legacy B4 RSK 5MT (JDM Import) and random 86 chassis rebuilds....