Thread: Philippines
View Single Post
Old 05-25-2013, 01:07 PM   #924
HRTROB
Senior Member
 
HRTROB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: Toyota 86
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 458
Thanks: 144
Thanked 271 Times in 140 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NIKDENG View Post
HRTROB,

Thanks for sharing your data. The baseline seems a little bit low at 152whp with stock ecu, stock intake, Milltek overpipe, front pipe, resonated catback. I've seen completely stock setups baseline from 168 - 172whp which is more in line with a 15% drive train power loss from the 200hp. Does this mean that the addition of the overpipe, front pipe and resonated catback on a stock ecu actually generated less power than stock setup? Even after installing the Unichip, the 168 whp is just like back to stock which seems to show that the addition of overpipe, frontpipe and different catback didn't add any power. Or can the variance be attributed to the differences in the types of dyno's used and testing conditions? Thanks.
I agree, baseline was pretty low. But this is because the runs were done on a dynojet, which reads lower than Speedlab's dynapack. The extremely high ambient temps also played a factor - dyno was back in April, middle of summer. There were three of us who dynoed that same day. 86 all stock except for TRD axleback pulled 152whp, and the other guy pulled 157whp 134tq and his 86 had the same Milltek over pipe, front pipe, resonated catback, but with Injen intake and Ecutek tuning. All of our cars were M/T, running Petron Blaze and the dealer Toyota 5w30 mineral oil.

168whp all stock on a dynojet is wishful thinking here in Metro Manila Patch from Autoplus showed us the baseline of their BRZ, only pulled 159whp
HRTROB is offline   Reply With Quote