Quote:
Originally Posted by HRTROB
Autoplus Dynojet
Ambient temp 36-37C
Humidity 54%
Both runs done on the same day, 30 minutes apart
Baseline: 152whp 127tq (stock ecu, stock intake, Milltek overpipe, front pipe, resonated catback)
With Unichip and Afe Takeda dry intake, Milltek overpipe, front pipe, resonated carback: 162whp 134tq
Gained about 10whp and 7tq. Not bad since the intake is known to produce only 5hp based on numerous dynos posted in this forum. With a little tweaking some power can still be squeezed out, as it was running richer than the stock tune. Will do another dyno run once the headers are installed 
Ecutek is great and has obviously more potential, but it costs more and inolves flashing the ecu, something I am not comfortable with, having previously bricked two PC motherboards trying to flash the BIOS. Plus you can resell the unichip and recoup some of your money, something you can't do with ecutek 
|
HRTROB,
Thanks for sharing your data. The baseline seems a little bit low at 152whp with stock ecu, stock intake, Milltek overpipe, front pipe, resonated catback. I've seen completely stock setups baseline from 168 - 172whp which is more in line with a 15% drive train power loss from the 200hp. Does this mean that the addition of the overpipe, front pipe and resonated catback on a stock ecu actually generated less power than stock setup? Even after installing the Unichip, the 168 whp is just like back to stock which seems to show that the addition of overpipe, frontpipe and different catback didn't add any power. Or can the variance be attributed to the differences in the types of dyno's used and testing conditions? Thanks.