View Single Post
Old 05-24-2013, 07:25 PM   #29
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porsche View Post
I don't think so.

Obviously, your personal experience has convinced you that this is true. I cannot argue with your personal experience, nor would I.

But your general assertion that modern cars suffer increased final oversteer as the speeds increase is simply false. You are mistaken.

It would be a disservice to the readers of these forums to allow this to go unchallenged.

I ask you to produce authoritative proof of your assertion on a broad, general scale.
Hey look my vehicle dynamics textbook is online!
Vehicle Stability

Basically in the section linked Figure 6.11 illustrates that a car setup for oversteer (like the FRS) will likely be more unstable at high speeds and a vehicle set up for undeersteer is stable at higher speeds. It's why 911's are so successful in racing but have a reputation for being hard to control for everyone else. It also explicitly states in the paragraph below the figure that a car that understeers will understeer MORE at higher speeds when comparing similar steering inputs (the graph shows the understeer line dropping off, representing unresponsiveness).

This is simplified and doesn't delve into specifics but I think it shows nicely that depending on the setup, some cars are stable, some aren't, depends on the car. And like you explained, not many people are willing to test this, much less journalists borrowing cars.

Don't you just love it when everybody is right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
autobrz (05-25-2013), racecaresuaceb (05-27-2013)