View Single Post
Old 12-09-2011, 03:44 PM   #62
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by old greg View Post
Unless you're about to swap ends because you weren't as talented at powersliding as you thought you were.
Technically wouldn't that already be past the limits and not near/at?

Quote:
The snap oversteer of the 1991-92 MR2 had nothing to do with steady-state cornering balance, which is what you are complaining about in this thread. The suspension geometry was such that the rear tires would toe out when the suspension was in droop. As such, if a driver entering a corner too hot lifted off the throttle (or applied a bit of brake) the forward load transfer would cause the rear suspension to extend, toe-ing out the rear tires and reducing rear cornering force (to a much greater degree than simple load transfer would cause). This was addressed by revising the rear suspension geometry for the 1993 model year. Spring/bar rates had nothing to do with it, and changing them made no real difference in that regard.
Agreed.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote