|
whoa whoa whoa....ok this thread is getting muddied up.
Sorry Driftster, I had to reread everything you have posted these past few pages..and I THINK I finally understand what your talking about.
But you know what your problem is? You talk to much! you add so much information and fluff to your posts that your point gets lost and nobody really gets what your trying to say so they respond to you without addressing what your post means.
What your trying to say....correct me if im wrong!
1. That this engine specifically, could be more friendly to CURRENT average turners if this engine was a basic design. Without DI, without fancy pistons, without high compression. To cater to a wider variety of current tuners be it N/A or Turbo users..Having that basic design for tuners to build on without defined factory limits. Right?
2. That your angry that Toyota and Subaru, very capable companies built a engine for this sports car, that has very strong defined limitations. And they have the audacity to claim the engine and car was built for enthusiasts and tuners..when only a small population of tuners can even freely precision tune this "tuner friendly car"
IF this is correct...i totally get you... but you really didn't have to post SO much information to get your point across.
|