Thread: FR-S vs S2000
View Single Post
Old 12-07-2011, 12:45 PM   #89
RYU
Senior Member
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: really slow...
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 737
Thanks: 340
Thanked 253 Times in 145 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cassidy0998 View Post
I suppose $10,000 on top of a used S2000 in good condition for $20k with 50k miles on it for 300hp is a little much. It sounds like a blast, but I've owned boosted cars. Extra hp isn't the only thing that interests me anymore.

If the FR-S ends up coming out with the option for a TRD s/c kit I will most likely be all over that. Will probably only give it about a 40hp increase but I feel that that is all it will need. Those looking for more power will most likely just be doing swaps.

I'm guessing stock for stock with S2000 will be 1 secondish quicker in the 1/4 mile than the FR-S/BRZ. S2000s run 14s don't they?
I completely agree. I currently own a Comptech Supercharged NSX. It's a hoot to drive but the more I track it the more I wish I kept it stock. On the track, i'm not really that much faster than an N/A and on some really tight tracks i'd be surprised if I was any faster at all. The thing heatsoaks after a long'ish session. Then you have to worry about an intercooler/aftercooler or meth/water and a standalone...the worry list just keeps on getting longer.

My Tacoma is also TRD supercharged. It's great to drive everyday but it too heatsoaks mildly on hot socal days.

$0.02... On a daily driver the SC is great. I actually prefer it. For a car that will see some (or a lot) of track time I prefer N/A and N/A bone stock really with a proper oil cooler and trans fluid cooler if auto. If not N/A i'd consider a turbo with a fat I/C.

Sometimes the confidence of being able to get home w/o having to call a tow truck is worth more than 50-75hp.
RYU is offline   Reply With Quote