Quote:
Originally Posted by CrashArtist
I did. About a year on a 92 civic hatchback, another on a ford probe, them 2 years on a '91 240sx and almost 1 years on a '96 and I almost forget a gsxr 1000 for about 4 months until I realized I was better off in 4 wheels. Then the other two cars i drove prior to the frs were also automatic because I was done with my street racing, getting tickets left and right and i was able to afford a new car.
My auto frs that have made me drive the way i used to. Not as hard because I haven't got any tickets on it -yet. Yes I get bored of my cars very fast and that's is why I've had quite a few. But I have to say it will be hard for me to get bored of my FRS.
The reason I din't mentioned it before is because it was irrelevant to my comment but thanks for asking. BTW I'm 26 in case i sound too old.
|
Thanks for letting me know. I think before making an assumption of which type of vehicle is better for anyone (because driving MT or AT is very opinionated), they would have to have driven both. If you sat in both seats, attempted to drive both without bias and choose -- then your opinion in the above would be 100% valid (in this case it is). If you come from AT world, never touched MT, think MT mode = MT -- then you're mistaken.
Thank you for sharing. I can understand that someone says AT or MT is best, but best for them! Not anyone else but them. People will always feel a way for the car, one way or another. My posts are always my opinion when it comes to this subject, in no way do I intend to force my opinion on others, but I think that in order to say one or the other is great -- the experience is what matters, and an unbiased experience is even greater.