View Single Post
Old 04-29-2013, 03:01 AM   #225
Darren Orange
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: Cadillac CTS Sport 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, United States
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
The term "Fuel economy" can be based on either money OR consumption. Its not exclusive to cost.

Economy is not a term reserved for "money".

There is no reason why not to base fuel economy in fuel used per mile. after all, every car manufacturer and their ads use it
Well based upon these numbers if we are talking costs...I think being able to run E85 even at lower MPG would likely be far cheaper.

E85 is normally about 15% cheaper plus the difference from having to run 91 or greater octane anyway with the car and you wind up with pretty much the difference.

My point being that I think our conversation about E85 is a mute point due to the cars requirement of high octane anyway. It's cars that run on 87 that don't seem to make up the difference.
Darren Orange is offline   Reply With Quote