View Single Post
Old 04-22-2013, 02:02 PM   #6
Sccabrz192
Detroit Region, MI
 
Sccabrz192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 13 Volt, 02 WRX
Location: Some Abandoned Slab of Concrete
Posts: 738
Thanks: 20
Thanked 200 Times in 143 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
:happy0180:

The only thing I wish they'd have included was a sunset rule opportunity for the new S-R designations per each classes participation. But I'll admit that is a bit of a selfish wish, and would assume most wouldn't last very long. Current FS seems to be the last group still a bit screwed by this change... which had dwindling participation recently anyway.

But otherwise, very much in favor of this update now. I like the re-writing of the camber allowance, though I see some people still having complaints that the new rule still remains strut-type only (wont see us complaining though hehe). I think the ESC/TC defeat rule is written better, and time will tell if it is still too open ended and permits the ability to hide other competitive-advantage fanciness.

Still not sure if I want to run this new "S" class long term, but I like the thought that I could run SR in 2014 and have an extra year of planning if I wanted to put together funding for a STX or maybe even a SP build.

35 for SSR 2 straight years seems steep for the sunset clause, but with numbers normally 60+, shouldnt be an issue.
__________________
Detroit / NWOR SCCA Member
2005-06: #192 ES 91 MR2 N/A Hardtop
2007-08: #54 STX 05 WRX Sedan
2009-12: #92 BSP/ASP 07 Solstice GXP
2013-14 : #192 CS 13 Subaru BRZ
Sccabrz192 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sccabrz192 For This Useful Post:
Scooby South (04-22-2013)