View Single Post
Old 04-22-2013, 04:59 AM   #41
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,384
Thanks: 13,790
Thanked 9,502 Times in 5,013 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by russv View Post
Having owned 10 Hondas and 1 Acura I can attest to the smoothness of Honda 4 cylinder engines (balance shafts being irrelevant to the topic), but I'm not convinced the Subaru flat 4 is any smoother. My opinion.
If you measure "smoothness" with your butt and your fingers it will be entirely subjective and any argument is pointless.

Subaru is known for being a bit rougher around the edges, they have stiffer motor mounts and less dampening in the cabins, Hondas are trying to toe the line between luxury and economy and as such have more damping.

The Honda will "feel" smoother, but what's actually happening in the engine is a lot of extra mass and development time get added to hide the vibrations that occur in the I4 engine arrangement, while boxer engines are dynamically in balance such that they don't need balance shafts or nearly as many tuned mass dampers.

You can say your Honda is "smoother", by most counts most people will agree with you. Saying your Honda I4 is "smoother" than any boxer engine is going to encourage lengthy heated arguments.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote