View Single Post
Old 04-20-2013, 11:16 PM   #11
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,443 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfusionpm View Post
The Z will definitely stick you to your seat a lot better under acceleration, but it also gets worse fuel mileage and weighs upwards of 1,000 lbs more. Totally different kind of car. The FR-S is light, nimble, and agile sports car. The Z is a heavy-hitting, grand touring sport car. Two different approaches, two very different feels. Z is also about 10 grand more to buy as well (even more for the high end touring models).

You can see which choice I made... No regrets whatsoever. I wish it did have a little more oomph in acceleration, but since I daily drive this thing, I love getting 32-34mpg highway, and 24-26mpg city.
i cant help but think that neither of those bold statements are true even though i agree with the overall message. i think for what nissan intended, the z is great its pretty far from offering the driving experience of the frs. iirc, its target was to bridge the gap from these small sports cars and the more gt or high speed cars like the corvette. i think the most telling thing about the car is that its not even really that trackable considering the brake and oil issues.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote