Quote:
Originally Posted by deucethemoose
I'm sure I am not the only one with this stance on the matter, but my issue with the supercharger option is the lack of torque, and the stupid amount of boost you have to run on them to make them comparable to most of the turbo applications out there already.
12psi on the stock motor isn't the greatest idea, and overall HP isn't what I'm looking for - it is the TORQUE that I want. Turbo kits like AVO's 5psi offering on standard 91 octane (most of us have 92 around) and zero fuel system mods puts out 230whp/197tq - which is more torque and close to your HP figure after you converted to e85, new injectors, new fuel pump, and a smaller pulley. FA20Club's kit nets even more on 5psi. 286whp/210tq.
The bottom line is there are more cost effective, scalable, and more efficient options out there. Supercharger on this motor doesn't appear to be worth the money.
|
Seriously? 3 different Dyno's bud. You can't compare numbers from 3 different cars using 3 different dyno's to state an argument. Dyno Dynamics are called Heart Breaker dyno's for a reason. They are the only ones I use to get my numbers with. Mustang Dyno is low reading also.
This car would break 400whp easy on a dynojet, and probably 430whp on a Dynopack.