View Single Post
Old 02-21-2013, 08:38 PM   #84
Ingen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: Ultramarine FR-S 6MT
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 525
Thanks: 349
Thanked 204 Times in 121 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by boead View Post
I wanted a hatchback too! There is NO good reason why this FR-S isn't a hatchback!
Err, yeah there is.

The Cayman is mid-engined. The engine block is probably used as a structural element, and even if it isn't the reinforced engine cradle is behind the driver and in the vicinity of the hatch. Therefore, it's got more stiffness in the rear and can sacrifice the stiffness of the rear panels to allow for a hatch back.

The FRS has its engine up front, and nothing in the back to stiffen it. With a half dozen giant braces back there then maybe the FRS could be a lift-back as well. But without any excessive bracing in the rear, and without the reinforcement of the engine mounts, it simply isn't stiff enough to allow for the lift back. You could stiffen it, but then it would be heavier, and who the hell wants that?

Moral of the story - Yes, mid engine is better. Also more expensive. The FRS has a tiny trunk opening because it's stiffer that way, and because it doesn't have an engine back there to lean on.
__________________


Car Received: 10/18. Break in ended: 10/28

Goal: Openflash UEL headers, Stage II 93 oct, TRD intake, arm rest :P
Ingen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ingen For This Useful Post:
rhoyle (02-21-2013)