View Single Post
Old 02-20-2013, 04:40 PM   #131
p4png
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: frs
Location: toronto
Posts: 56
Thanks: 6
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
this kind of hyperbole really bugs me. they are cars and relatively sporty cars at that. they dont have completely different targets. the have marginally different targets.
I'm stating facts from experience.
Si vs frs in canada is around same price
Si has sunroof, rear seat leg room, standard nav, fwd (great for winter here), auto headlights, now comes with climate control, iMid display.
All which are great for the regular driver plus some power. All which are unnecessary for sports performance hence why frs doesn't include any of these

Frs
Everything about sports performance, low center of gravity, rwd, balanced, minimal body roll (si had lots of), etc (you guys already know)

This is my opinion and there are my facts. If you disagree please state your facts on why they are "marginally different targets" otherwise your post become meaningless to this thread.
p4png is offline   Reply With Quote