View Single Post
Old 11-06-2011, 04:26 PM   #176
Mr.Jay
Senior Member
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: FRS :D
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,985
Thanks: 545
Thanked 699 Times in 438 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAImportTuner View Post
There is no winning, if you haven't owned any of the cars in question than you really can't speak on them. Fortunately I have.
I agree but also don't think its fair to compare the frs based off of leaked info consider like you said you can't really speak on them if you have never own them


Quote:
Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 View Post
I think some people are misunderstanding what some people meant about having good usable torque. A car with weak torque will get the job done on regular roads but for some people it can be a pain in the ass especially if you have passengers and other shit in the car. I bought my GF a 2000 civic and I hate driving that POS. Feels like im destroying the car just to accelerate and the car is light(2350 lbs) with 107lb ft of torque.
Was it a auto? The transmission plans a big part in perceived speed. I went from a 96 civic d16y7 stick to a 99 civic si d16y8 (vtec) auto and the stick while having less HP and TQ felt faster due to stick shifting where I wanted compared to the poorly geared auto car
__________________
Out of the FRS game
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote