View Single Post
Old 01-19-2013, 02:10 PM   #48
GNS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: .
Location: Ontario
Posts: 350
Thanks: 28
Thanked 223 Times in 105 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demandred7 View Post
I totally agree, to my brain BMW and Mazda have it backwards (pull down to upshift). Maybe they are trying to emulate grabbing for second gear.
Perhaps (and that does make sense), but the official reason BMW and Mazda have given is because you're pushed back in your seat as the car accelerates. Pulling back on the lever to up shift from 1st (which is mostly just to get the car moving) to 2nd is a motion that doesn't fight against the force of acceleration pushing you back, if that makes sense.

Also, from personal experience on a real MT car, I tend to cruise in 4th in the city and 6th on the highway (obviously). Downshifting causes deceleration, which pushes me forward in the seat, AND the motion to downshift to 5th/3rd is a push on the shifter forward.

There is no perfect analogy, as you might expect, but my vast preference is for the pull to upshift / push to downshift method.


Also...think of the flight controls of an aircraft - you pull back to tilt the plane upwards, and push forward to tilt the plane downwards. On a game controller, this is interpreted as pushing UP on the D-pad to make the plane go DOWN, and vice versa. Obviously this isn't the same situation as on a real car, but the terms 'up' and 'down' don't always correspond with the desired result you want from the vehicle because of the very real fact that you're controlling a (represented) physical object instead of a couple variables in software.

Last edited by GNS; 01-19-2013 at 02:21 PM.
GNS is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GNS For This Useful Post:
Demandred7 (01-19-2013)