View Single Post
Old 01-13-2013, 11:07 AM   #96
Illusive
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2005 Subaru STi
Location: Sealy, TX
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 21 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses View Post
A) Dynojet.
B) Always compare percent delta HP rather than raw delta HP; it is a more accurate manner of ascertaining power change.
Not true.

We have several dyno plots of our FR-S that show it making 165 whp bone stock with low miles and no engine break-in.

We could just as easily posted up those as the "before" and then made it look like we were tuning gods by making 25-30 whp with just a tune.

Heck we could have also posted the 173 whp dyno plots with the IAM set to 0.7 which is the default setting and shown that as the "before" showing gains of 17-20 whp from just "tune"

Point being using the before then after delta is not always accurate if the before figures are being fudged to sell the product.
Illusive is offline   Reply With Quote