View Single Post
Old 10-20-2011, 02:21 PM   #30
Spaceywilly
ZC6A2B82KC7J
 
Spaceywilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: 2002 WRX
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 361
Thanked 727 Times in 236 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
Not a chance that I would buy a vehicle with those "estimated" stats from C&D. Also that article seemed out of characteristic for C&D. Since when do they say that a car already has more than enough horsepower? How can you say that for a car they think can't hit 60 in less than 6 seconds?

Very disappointing mpg estimates as well. (for reference the S2000's EPA rating was 20/25)

Every time a car magazines says anything about this car it makes me lose interest. Hopefully Subaru/Toyota is trying to pull a fast one, and just doing this to really wow us come Toyota. While it seems like a long shot, fingers crossed!
Here's what I think happened, Subaru was upset about the amount of press Toyota has been getting, so they "asked" C&D to do a puff piece, saying how Subaru did all the work and the car is the best thing ever. And by asked I mean paid. You can tell from the tone of the article that it is not an honest review. It is just way too pro Subaru and pro BRZ.

I also suspect they might've thrown out those crappy numbers on purpose to "soften the blow" if the real numbers aren't what everyone is expecting. Now, if it is maybe 2600lbs and $24,000, C&D can say "wow, it is lighter and cheaper than we were expecting!" and people will think it's great.
__________________

Straights are for fast cars. Turns are for fast drivers.

Last edited by Spaceywilly; 10-20-2011 at 02:44 PM.
Spaceywilly is offline   Reply With Quote