View Single Post
Old 01-08-2013, 02:49 AM   #84
rice_classic
Senior Member
 
rice_classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Nevermorange FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,174
Thanks: 757
Thanked 4,208 Times in 1,808 Posts
Mentioned: 78 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by smbrm View Post
Just add to the debate, VI is not really relevant if you don't understand the permanent shear stability or the HTHS of the oil.
I concur.

Also note that only a one point difference at 40C makes a bigger difference in the VI number than a point difference at 100C. That chart above sort of illustrates this as the Sustina has both the lowest 40C and 100C KV. If my engine were (theoretically) designed to run at 100C between 8-9 cSt then the Sustina would be a poor option.

I personally take VI cum grano salis and think it's not the best rating to base judgement on.

What I find great about these long, entertaining and often educational oil analysis debates is just when we're thinking we've got our fingers on the button the ALMS teams go run 24 hours endurance races on engines that make several hundred horse power on straight 0 weight oil. I love when auto racing does that.

Is anyone here obsessing this much about he quality of the food that goes in their mouths as we do about oil? I bet if we all focused on that a little more we, instead of our engines, would all perform better and last a little longer. just sayin'
__________________
SCCA T4 - FRS
rice_classic is offline   Reply With Quote