Thread: Frs vs s2000
View Single Post
Old 12-27-2012, 09:07 PM   #201
ayau
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: Some rust bucket
Location: Polar ice cap
Posts: 3,058
Thanks: 312
Thanked 1,046 Times in 556 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
Out of context!

But the Cd has been published! 0.38 vs 0.27.

Additionally, the s2k makes substantial rear lift....

Jacked a picture from Evasive/Maxrev... courtesy of Voltex.

let me preface my post and say that i'm not an engineer by any means. i'm simply a car enthusiast.

is the coefficient of drag (cd) a good number to use when evaluating a car's overall aero efficiency?

does it take into account downforce and lift?

for example, the s2k cr has a higher cd, but due to the cr bumper/wing, it may create more downforce than the brz.

at the same time, the s2k may generate more lift and a wing is needed to generate downforce to create cornering stability.

i'm just not sure if a cd is a good indicator of a car's overall aero efficiency. it seems more like a marketing term to me.

just trying to spark up an intelligent discussion.
ayau is offline   Reply With Quote