Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevermore
I don't know how to put this without sounding creepy, but to me it's just logical. When you originally asked, I wouldn't have guessed she was any older than 12, and my reasoning for that is because those are not adult legs. You can tell she isn't fully mature. A woman's legs would have more shape and tone.
Maybe there's just something weird about the way I see things, but that's how I saw it. As far as the subject goes, a girl that young shouldn't dress like that. But, to each their own, I guess.
|
I saw her face and thought "child" too. So don't feel bad, it's perfectly logical.
But she is certainly tall, I'll admit that.