View Single Post
Old 12-13-2012, 07:39 PM   #35
Captain Insano
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: 2014 Jeep Wrangler RubiconX
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 1,282
Thanks: 110
Thanked 292 Times in 224 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
The same could be said on an MT or AT.
The point was that incremental drops in rotating mass won't help as much as you're making it seem like they do.

And the tiny fraction of a difference the torque converter makes compared to the MT, you could again say the same thing you said...
The point was that incremental drops in rotating mass won't help as much as you're making it seem like they do.

I guess my opinion is - if you are contending these pulleys make no difference or minimal difference on an AT or MT, maybe that is true, I haven't run them. But I would say I'm a very firm believer in dropping weight, especially rotational weight. If you are trying to say these pulleys make a bigger difference on an MT versus an AT, maybe, but I woudl think it would be so imperceptible that the diff would not be noticeable.

I'm done, I'm not going to fight about AT versus MT. It has been beaten to death.

The pulleys look great.
Captain Insano is offline